I might be wrong, but as far as i can figure it out, this camera makes no sense to me in its current state.
First of all, I love the concept, but it fails with regards to fundamental multicamera production strategies.
The reason is the choice of MFT lens mount and lack off lens control interface for broadcast lenses.
After all, the camera is designed solely for the purpose of multicamera shoots. At witch You are going to need at least a lens with decent zoom range/factor with fast servo control and manual focus directly available on the handles. Anything else will severely impact directors ability to call for fast paced composition of frames in run and gun situations.
This effectively means that you will need B4 (2/3) broadcast lenses for anything but the smallest shooting areas/situations. And when current optical lens converters, that compensates for the missing prism in 2/3 systems, comes at a price tag of about $ 6K, the camera pricing seems trivial.
I would definately appreciate a BMD solution for this in form of a reasonably priced converter with connector for the lens cable, or even better, an upgraded version with direct support for B4 lenses.
But then again, why not equip the URSA with the same remote controll abilities, fiber connection, tally and intercom?