Peter Pavlov wrote:Hello everyone, i'm about to sell my BMPCC and buy a BMCC. Is there a real difference of image quality between FullHD and 2.5k?
Don't do it!!
BMCC MFT is a step backwards in terms of body size (and the BMCC EF is a *big* leap backwards vs the BMPCC).
The next logical upgrade step would be to get a BMD Micro Cinema Camera. (in many ways it is like a polished and improved BMPCC, while still a BMPCC at its core).
Of course, the really big leap forward is to get a Blackmagic URSA Mini 4.6K (or even better, the Pro).
But that is a very big leap forward in cost and size (and you've got a heck of a lot of other strong competitors in that price bracket).
I'd just stay with your BMPCC for now? Is what I'm doing (although, I have a Sony PMW-F3 as well), unless the Micro magically goes on half price sale as well
If you want something "better" than a BMPCC but not at URSA Mini Pro / Sony FS5 / FS7 / new Panasonic Mini Varicam (or whatever they call it) / etc pricing, then you probably need to look outside BMD to maybe a Panasonic GH5? Or a secondhand FS700+Shogun combo.
But pickings are slim there to get something really a lot "better" than the BMPCC, as it is so good already! And something like a GH5 is half "better" and half simply "different", as a BMPCC still would have its fans over a GH5 in some cases (color/raw/dynamic range).