- Posts: 3362
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:58 am
- Location: Earth
Yes there will be $32k cameras (more or less), but 32k cameras need not cost that much. They could cost hundreds. I'm jot talking about the digital cinema sensor with sensor pads measured in nanometers, bit just 1 micron ones. What application, car, transport and security cams a lot. See, its about evidence. People ask me where's the evidence, but don't stump up a 100 million starting funding or a non disclosure agreement, or offer evidence of sincerity. At distance it is important to have a lot of.detail I'm the evidence chain.
Say somebody is behaving erratically some distance away in traffic causing a sequence of events that you suddenly are thrust into. On a QVGA resolution sensor you might see little. On a fhd sensor you can see little st double the distance but more before. At each of 4k, 8k, 16k, and 32k you see double the distance. Now you can id the driver responsible, and if close enough, see his state of mind causing the accident. You no longer have a jumble of pixels on a 140-360 degree image, and in 3D stereo high frame rate even.
Let's look at security. Now. You can wide angle and post digitally zoom in. A single camera looks around, and tells you what is happening a while away.
Now, you could buy such a thing and film with it.
Now let's look at a micron spacing of 32k. That's a 32mm+ sensor, doable today, doable cheaply in future. One of the problems with small sensor pads, is that light itself is erratic. While visible light may fit into 1 micron, light photons get pushed SNF pulled around, producing a lot of noise. And they might hit the edge of one or more pads at a time. So. Lower quality. But it's ok.
Say somebody is behaving erratically some distance away in traffic causing a sequence of events that you suddenly are thrust into. On a QVGA resolution sensor you might see little. On a fhd sensor you can see little st double the distance but more before. At each of 4k, 8k, 16k, and 32k you see double the distance. Now you can id the driver responsible, and if close enough, see his state of mind causing the accident. You no longer have a jumble of pixels on a 140-360 degree image, and in 3D stereo high frame rate even.
Let's look at security. Now. You can wide angle and post digitally zoom in. A single camera looks around, and tells you what is happening a while away.
Now, you could buy such a thing and film with it.
Now let's look at a micron spacing of 32k. That's a 32mm+ sensor, doable today, doable cheaply in future. One of the problems with small sensor pads, is that light itself is erratic. While visible light may fit into 1 micron, light photons get pushed SNF pulled around, producing a lot of noise. And they might hit the edge of one or more pads at a time. So. Lower quality. But it's ok.
aIf you are not truthfully progressive, maybe you shouldn't say anything
bTruthful side topics in-line with or related to, the discussion accepted
cOften people deceive themselves so much they do not understand, even when the truth is explained to them
bTruthful side topics in-line with or related to, the discussion accepted
cOften people deceive themselves so much they do not understand, even when the truth is explained to them