Blackmagic Forum

I really like this setup. What tripod and head are they using?



This image can be found on Blackmagic's site via the link below

Code: Select all

https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/blackmagicursaminipro/workflow#studio

Thanks in advance.

It is a Sachtler, Could be a Sachtler 10 to 18 head or something..

These puppies take from 1 to 15 kilo's.. We got all Sachtlers.. They are great but very very expensive!
https://www.sachtler.com/products/fluid-heads/dv-12-sb/

Check out Sirui tripods and heads for a more affordable alternative -- their video tripods and heads are quite good. Still not cheap, though!

The ones in the BMD illustration are an artist’s rendering of a typical pro tripod head, and not any specific one.
Cheers

Denny Smith wrote:The ones in the BMD illustration are an artist’s rendering of a typical pro tripod head, and not any specific one.
Cheers

Denny it is a Sachtler.. The Big S on the fluid head is giving it away. Also the tripod under there is complete sachtler. Only the image is to small to see what model it is.

It is this tripod. But the exact type number of the head is unclear. Actually i think this is a real photo and HDR retouched to give it the same look and feel. Also see that the Director monitor is not a BMD one. Which would be a Smart view 4K if it was a render So i rather think it is a Set picture from one of the movies shot with Ursa.. And retouched to make it the HDR feel of BMD website.

OOH And it is defenitly retouched.

See the black wire of the power supply going up the tripod, But the XLR 4 pin is missing on the back. But the way that cable has those kinks is exact how it would like when wrapped tight in a box and remove the binder.

Also anyone seen a left hand? Because the camera Op is missing his

And in a render you would left out the Yellow power extension cord laying on the floor.. So defenitly a real photo and a bit of photoshopping

OK Daniel, you win that one, but a retouched Photoshop or rendering, or a combo of both, all equals a representation of the real thing, but not necessarily completely accurate, which was my point.
Cheers