cheezweezl wrote:Ok guys. Clearly I have posted this in the wrong place. My apologies. Thought it would be fun. Carry on with whatever it is that draws you to this site. Later.
EDIT: I have edited my post, I really need to try harder to accept the things that bother me.
@cheezweezl I like the footage, I think there should have been a reference of some sort..Even a simple thing like what lens was used for each shot, at least that way we could have some sort of gauge.
Secondly your CC (Kelvin)is a bit sloppy from one scene to the next
(Daylight in some scenes and Tungsten the next) making it even harder to gauge what footage was shot on what camera, Slow motion is the only dead giveaway!
And although that does scream.... "
This is a Challenge" it is bar far the hardest visually to interpret, I will give some blame to you tube compression, and some to per-colored footage....
But for the most part this challenge is infected...>>> Quoting
"Mac Jaeger" "this footage has been tampered with". And in no way can be described as a "RED vs BMCC" challenge,
As I can appreciate your efforts, this has all the markings of a "FAILED ATTEMPT".
This is not to say the footage does not look good! It looks great!, but I see no challenge in the different shots, this may as well be a good thing, If the BMCC 2.5K can match RED Epic footage??
Then what the hell is the problem?