BMCC EF or MFT?
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 5:51 pm
Hi all-
I am confused as to which I would be better off with- the EF or MFT version of the BMCC (I am not interested in the pocket camera, I want the 2.5k raw capability)
I am planning on mostly tripod work, documentaries, interview kind of things (I have a project in mind, and then some- after I figure out how it all works ). I might do some handheld, but not much.
I have quite a bit of good and some excellent nikon glass at my disposal (the list, if it helps: old beast of a 20-35 f/2.8, 28mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.4 and f/1.8 versions, 70-200 f/2.8, 35mm (f/1.4 & dx f/1.8), plus some others). A couple of the old ones have an aperture ring, but most don't.
Would it be a mistake to think that I can rely on using the speedbooster all of the time?
I should mention that my alternative would be the EF mount, along with a decent zoom (maybe the sigma 18-35 f/1.8, or the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8), along with a novaflex adapter or similar to use my nikon lenses on that body as well.
Many Thanks,
-jamie
I am confused as to which I would be better off with- the EF or MFT version of the BMCC (I am not interested in the pocket camera, I want the 2.5k raw capability)
I am planning on mostly tripod work, documentaries, interview kind of things (I have a project in mind, and then some- after I figure out how it all works ). I might do some handheld, but not much.
I have quite a bit of good and some excellent nikon glass at my disposal (the list, if it helps: old beast of a 20-35 f/2.8, 28mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.4 and f/1.8 versions, 70-200 f/2.8, 35mm (f/1.4 & dx f/1.8), plus some others). A couple of the old ones have an aperture ring, but most don't.
Would it be a mistake to think that I can rely on using the speedbooster all of the time?
I should mention that my alternative would be the EF mount, along with a decent zoom (maybe the sigma 18-35 f/1.8, or the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8), along with a novaflex adapter or similar to use my nikon lenses on that body as well.
Many Thanks,
-jamie