Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:49 pm
It's cool with me if you want to discuss other cameras, but of course it's obviously off-topic. But I love video gear, so it's all good.
And, before I go any farther, please understand that even more than I want an information update from BMD, I want my BMCC itself. Each of us gets to decide how long we're willing to wait for our cameras, and some are more or less patient than others. That's also all good.
Comparing the BMCC to cameras that cost 50% or 100% or >200% more does get a bit odd fairly quickly. It's a bit like comparing very different kinds of trucks: Pick-up trucks, dump trucks, mini-vans, cargo vans, etc. They're all trucks, but inherently suited to widely different purposes given their features, and they sell for widely different prices.
I use a FS100 frequently. It's a nice camera for the price, but it is what it is. Among other things, it's an 8-bit camera that natively records AVCHD at a relatively low data rate. I'm fairly certain its HDMI output is 8-bit only, too. So even if you record its live HDMI out to a 10-bit recorder, you're still only getting 8-bits worth of color information. Obviously there can be other advantages to the external recorder (higher data rate, etc.), but all that comes at a price. It can be an apples & oranges comparison talking about the FS100 and the BMCC.
Likewise the C100, F3, F700, etc., etc. All nice cameras, some much more expensive than a BMCC. Although they each have features the BMCC lacks, importantly the reverse is also true. Plus, none of them include the BMCC's awesome software bundle. Again, apples & oranges.
Cheers.