- Posts: 93
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 1:00 am
I recently purchased a Sigma 18-35 mm zoom and a Metabones Speed booster. When the lens is used on my BMPCC either with or without the Metabones it does not hold focus during a zoom, i.e the combination is not parfocal.
If it was a film camera one would simply temporally replace the film with a hard flat plate and measure the flange/film distance with a depth gauge. As this is not an option I have used a different approach to find the problem.
I have a portable illuminated test target (autocollimator) that produces an image that appears to be at infinity to an observer or to a camera. It can be used to check infinity settings on camera lenses. When I fit the 18-35 to my Nikon I find that this combination holds focus during a zoom and also that the infinity graduation on the lens is accurate. When I test other Nikon lenses on my Nikon I get similar results so I now trust the Nikon and Sigma both as a combination and individually.
Having eliminated the Sigma as the cause of my problem it means that my problem is either with the Metabones or Nikon /MFT adapter or the BMPCC. To use the Sigma without the Metabones I use a Nikon to MFT adapter. When I use the Sigma with this Nikon/MFT adapter I also find that zooms are not parfocal. To achieve focus on my infinity target I have to focus the Sigma at less than infinity which means that the lens is not far enough from the sensor for either the Metabones/BMPCC combination or the Nikon MFT adaptor/BMPCC combination. The adapters are made by different manufacturers and I would be surprised if they both had similar manufacturing errors which leads me to suspect the BMPCC.
As both the BMPCC and Sigma are both under warranty I do not intend to fiddle with either. However my Nikon/MFT adapter was cheap and furthermore it is easy to remove the Nikon mount and pack it out with shims so that the lens is further from the sensor. I have now tried three thicknesses of packing. My calculations suggested that the flange sensor distance was short by 0.4 – 0.6 mm (given the paucity of lens graduations it was hard to come up with a better figure). In fact even packing out by 0.9 mm was not quite enough. This is a massive error and suggests to me that a shim has been omitted in the manufacture of my BMPCC.
The obvious location for a shim would be between the BMPCC lens mount and body. Could someone tell me if there is a shim in this location – it should be obvious as it would be ~ 1 mm thick?
If it was a film camera one would simply temporally replace the film with a hard flat plate and measure the flange/film distance with a depth gauge. As this is not an option I have used a different approach to find the problem.
I have a portable illuminated test target (autocollimator) that produces an image that appears to be at infinity to an observer or to a camera. It can be used to check infinity settings on camera lenses. When I fit the 18-35 to my Nikon I find that this combination holds focus during a zoom and also that the infinity graduation on the lens is accurate. When I test other Nikon lenses on my Nikon I get similar results so I now trust the Nikon and Sigma both as a combination and individually.
Having eliminated the Sigma as the cause of my problem it means that my problem is either with the Metabones or Nikon /MFT adapter or the BMPCC. To use the Sigma without the Metabones I use a Nikon to MFT adapter. When I use the Sigma with this Nikon/MFT adapter I also find that zooms are not parfocal. To achieve focus on my infinity target I have to focus the Sigma at less than infinity which means that the lens is not far enough from the sensor for either the Metabones/BMPCC combination or the Nikon MFT adaptor/BMPCC combination. The adapters are made by different manufacturers and I would be surprised if they both had similar manufacturing errors which leads me to suspect the BMPCC.
As both the BMPCC and Sigma are both under warranty I do not intend to fiddle with either. However my Nikon/MFT adapter was cheap and furthermore it is easy to remove the Nikon mount and pack it out with shims so that the lens is further from the sensor. I have now tried three thicknesses of packing. My calculations suggested that the flange sensor distance was short by 0.4 – 0.6 mm (given the paucity of lens graduations it was hard to come up with a better figure). In fact even packing out by 0.9 mm was not quite enough. This is a massive error and suggests to me that a shim has been omitted in the manufacture of my BMPCC.
The obvious location for a shim would be between the BMPCC lens mount and body. Could someone tell me if there is a shim in this location – it should be obvious as it would be ~ 1 mm thick?