Cropfactor 2.3 or 2.4 ?

The place for questions about shooting with Blackmagic Cameras.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

jenson

  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 9:46 pm

Cropfactor 2.3 or 2.4 ?

PostTue Jan 08, 2013 12:47 pm

I always read both. Wath is now the exactly cropfactor of the sensor?
Offline

Shawn Miller

  • Posts: 195
  • Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:34 pm
  • Location: Seattle, WA.

Re: Cropfactor 2.3 or 2.4 ?

PostTue Jan 08, 2013 9:50 pm

1.6 when compared to Super 35 film...

Shawn
Corporate Video Producer | Independent Filmmaker | Editor | VFX Generalist
Offline
User avatar

Nick Bedford

  • Posts: 352
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 3:56 am
  • Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Cropfactor 2.3 or 2.4 ?

PostTue Jan 08, 2013 11:25 pm

Full Frame:
36x24mm (36x20.25mm in 16:9) = 2.27x

Canon APS-C:
22.3x14.9mm (22.3x12.54mm in 16:9) = 1.41x

Here's how I might classify focal lengths on the Cinema Camera.

<11mm is extra wide.
11mm is wide.
17mm is "normal".
25mm is portrait.
35mm is starting to look telephoto.
70mm is a telephoto.
200mm is long telephoto.
1200mm is just ridiculous ;)
Nick Bedford, Photographer
http://www.nickbedford.com/
Offline

Joel Crane

  • Posts: 103
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:55 am
  • Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: Cropfactor 2.3 or 2.4 ?

PostWed Jan 09, 2013 11:16 am

Nick Bedford wrote:1200mm is just ridiculous ;)

Well yes. Yes it is, Nick. :D
___________________________________________________

Joel Crane

- Photographer - Filmmaker - Superhero -
www.joelcranephotography.com
Offline
User avatar

Nick Bedford

  • Posts: 352
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 3:56 am
  • Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Cropfactor 2.3 or 2.4 ?

PostWed Jan 09, 2013 8:57 pm

Joel Crane wrote:
Nick Bedford wrote:1200mm is just ridiculous ;)

Well yes. Yes it is, Nick. :D


Look Fred, I see the space station.
Nick Bedford, Photographer
http://www.nickbedford.com/
Offline

Shawn Miller

  • Posts: 195
  • Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:34 pm
  • Location: Seattle, WA.

Re: Cropfactor 2.3 or 2.4 ?

PostThu Jan 10, 2013 12:24 am

Nick Bedford wrote:Full Frame:
36x24mm (36x20.25mm in 16:9) = 2.27x

Canon APS-C:
22.3x14.9mm (22.3x12.54mm in 16:9) = 1.41x

Here's how I might classify focal lengths on the Cinema Camera.

<11mm is extra wide.
11mm is wide.
17mm is "normal".
25mm is portrait.
35mm is starting to look telephoto.
70mm is a telephoto.
200mm is long telephoto.
1200mm is just ridiculous ;)


Fair enough, but Full Frame and APS-C are standards for stills cameras. Maybe it's more useful to refer to AbelCine's FOV comparator to understand where the BMCC sits (FOV wise) compared other film or video cameras.

http://abelcine.com/fov/

Shawn

Shawn
Corporate Video Producer | Independent Filmmaker | Editor | VFX Generalist

Return to Cinematography

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: lukepett and 97 guests