Ted Blanco wrote:This post should be directed at Metabones (unless BM really were to buy the company.)
I don't think it is even necessary to try and turn the 4/3 into super 35, just reducing the crop to the likes of an APS-C sensor would be a huge improvement. If they can pull that off, something tells me I will be switching to the 4/3 mount in the future.
To summarize the white paper if my understanding of the optics is correct:
The Metabones focal-reducer on a EF lens-to-MFT mount creates an image circle of about 21.6mm in diameter on a true micro four-thirds sensor with a resulting multiplier of 0.71 affecting the field-of-view on a full-frame 35mm lens, for example, as if it were now a 25mm lens and a full stop faster as long as the wide aperture of the EF lens is about f1.26. Please take a moment to digest that.
Now we are concerned here about the BMCC which as you know has a sensor size smaller than a micro four-thirds sensor. If we take the identical focal-reducer and mount it on the BMCC MFT camera, about 15% of that reduced image circle is lost as the BMCC sensor fits well within the image circle. So we will see the increased centre sharpness and even less of the loss of resolution at the edges and we get the increased brightness of the lens, but we won't quite get back to the field-of -view of a true micro four-thirds sensor. Instead of seeing the FOV of a 25mm lens, our 35mm EF lens will look like a 28mm or 29mm lens! Still amazing.
Please let me know if my reasoning is flawed.
Rick Lang
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD