aaronalbright wrote:My fear is that the BMMCC will be somewhat obsolete by the time it's actually released. The case in point: I was lined up and excited to purchase this camera, then Sony swept in with the a6300 and diverted my attentions greatly with, what some may argue, a superior camera. 4K internal/external, 14 stops DR, Sony's proprietary ISO algorithms, 120fps, etc, all at the same price point of $1000. Now, there's no Global Shutter on the a6300 but even still it's caused the BMMCC to already show signs of age even before it's in the hands of the consumer.
I understand getting behind the ball when it comes to production and shipping, but at almost a year behind schedule, they can't expect people to wait around forever, and they can't be upset when those same people, upset over having to wait as long as they have, take their money to the competitor.
BMD is only seven iso months behind schedule, although it seems like a year lol, and I'm sure they won't be upset what so ever if you buy the camera that you truly want.
The sony will be a great camera no doubt. Several of the BMCusers have debated this very topic on the other forum. Both have positives and minuses depending on how and what you're shooting. And the main concern people who normally gravitate towards BMD cameras have with the Sony seems to be the 8bit compressed codec (which others have made a strong argument for). It seems to be that any convince feature a camera has is greatly out weighed buy the RAW at 60fps, global shutter, and superior color science of the BMMCC.
I'm patiently waiting myself. And pretty much all the footage I shoot would benefit from a more versatile run and gun style camera, but I can't get away from the images the BMD cameras produce. I actually enjoy a little extra workflow. It teaches me something every time, and call me crazy, to be honest I like to sit down and edit footage.