New Camera?

The place for questions about shooting with Blackmagic Cameras.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

Cedric Akins

  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:50 am

New Camera?

PostFri Aug 11, 2017 6:48 am

I am wondering if there are any plans to update the BMPCC to a better sensor that shoots 2.5K-3K? It is a great little camera, I own two of them. And I enjoy shooting with them. However, it is still 1080p. I would buy another one of these with an upgraded sensor and in natural lighting they can have a ton of dead pixels in any given frame. A better sensor that captured a clean raw image is just a thought. I know that this question has been asked several times but I was just asking anyway.
Offline
User avatar

rick.lang

  • Posts: 7059
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:41 pm
  • Location: Victoria BC Canada

Re: New Camera?

PostFri Aug 11, 2017 1:18 pm

Certainly a common request. Look for something at IBC 2017 or NAB 2018 etc. Taking a smaller die of the 4.6K sensor would sell very well in the BMMCC or BMPCC or BMCC. Currently the 4.6K sensor and the processor to handle it may generate too much heat for the smaller cameras. But if you can be patient, you may have something you like in the future. It may cost more though. Having a sensor larger than your deliverables is a great feature that you'll love when it comes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rick Lang
Offline

Denny Smith

  • Posts: 6551
  • Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 4:19 pm
  • Location: USA, Northern Calif.

Re: New Camera?

PostFri Aug 11, 2017 5:51 pm

The next update of the Pocket camera will be need to be at least a 4K sensor, according to BM. They have no plans to offer a lower resolution camera at this time, according to recent reports from BM. The only current update of thrnPocket camera, using the same sensor, is the Micro Cinema camera which does have a newer, faster and slightly better video processor, which solves some of the moire and rolling shutter issues of the BMCC and BMPCC.

BM has also stated they currently have not been able to find a suitable 4K sensor for new Pocket/Micro camera.
Denny Smith
SHA Productions
Offline

Wayne Steven

  • Posts: 295
  • Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:58 am

Re: New Camera?

PostSat Aug 12, 2017 11:01 am

rick.lang wrote:Certainly a common request. Look for something at IBC 2017 or NAB 2018 etc. Taking a smaller die of the 4.6K sensor would sell very well in the BMMCC or BMPCC or BMCC. Currently the 4.6K sensor and the processor to handle it may generate too much heat for the smaller cameras. But if you can be patient, you may have something you like in the future. It may cost more though. Having a sensor larger than your deliverables is a great feature that you'll love when it comes.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Like the J1 cmpMera many years ago with a cheap Ambarella 4k chipset at 220 mb/s. A step above the Yi 4k+. I would like to see the next to m43rds. Or using a phone chipset recording Raw, for under $1000.
Offline

Wayne Steven

  • Posts: 295
  • Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:58 am

Re: New Camera?

PostSat Aug 12, 2017 11:11 am

Denny, they have two suppliers capable of doing it, one with much better technology then in the present 4k. But, whatever they call themselves now Altima or Sony sensors are what the need to source cheap. Go and look at the axiom camera sensor list, maybe a bit outdated now, but see how hopeless these non Sony sensors are. There must be heaps of m43rds or smaller sensors available, are they looking for s35. They might as well do a hydrogen multicamera, and get 4 good phone cameras.on a mobile chipset in a video assist or light 16 like design and call it a day. There are some non crappy small sensors around. They could contract out the manufacture to a mobile phone factory and get a sub $1k camera out.
Offline
User avatar

Nick Gombinsky

  • Posts: 212
  • Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:30 pm
  • Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: New Camera?

PostSat Aug 12, 2017 4:41 pm

So you want a camera that feels good on the spec sheet but pretty much sucks when you actually try to use it? Imagine these forums when they try to use a new BM camera with a cellphone chip and struggle to get professional results...
Offline

Denny Smith

  • Posts: 6551
  • Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 4:19 pm
  • Location: USA, Northern Calif.

Re: New Camera?

PostSat Aug 12, 2017 6:28 pm

The issue isn't that there are not any 4K 1-inch sensors, there are. The issue for BM as they stated it, is, the available sensors did not give the results and Cinematic look that the current 2K sensor gives on the Pocket/Micro camera, that BM is looking for. :roll:
Cheers
Denny Smith
SHA Productions
Offline
User avatar

rick.lang

  • Posts: 7059
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:41 pm
  • Location: Victoria BC Canada

Re: New Camera?

PostSat Aug 12, 2017 8:50 pm

Size (of a photosite) matters!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rick Lang
Offline

Chris Chiasson

  • Posts: 313
  • Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:32 pm

Re: New Camera?

PostSun Aug 13, 2017 12:44 am

I've noticed the Blackmagic Production and 2.5K cameras are gone from their site. Maybe we're finally getting something new in those areas. That, or they're just discontinuing them, and there's no DSLR competitor for them.

I hope they are. Even if they can't make a 4K Pocket right now, at least make a camera that's the same size of a GH5, but designed for Video.
Offline
User avatar

Nick Gombinsky

  • Posts: 212
  • Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:30 pm
  • Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: New Camera?

PostSun Aug 13, 2017 12:50 am

The Micro line could fall into that category, with some creativity... I really like them, even though they were designed the way they are so they can be mounted on drones, I think they give us the possibility of turning it into a real video camera with a monitor where you want it, the kind of battery you want, etc.

One of the things I hated about the DSLR era was that nothing was in the right place compared to a video camera... now with the micro we can create our own, without as many adapters, without so much weight on the wrong side.
Offline
User avatar

Dmitry Shijan

  • Posts: 193
  • Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:15 pm
  • Location: UA

Re: New Camera?

PostSun Aug 13, 2017 3:53 pm

Wish they keep current 1080p sensor but added OLPF, handle grip, large size user friendly buttons and joystick to control camera, LUT support, FPN correction, full sized camera connectors directed in correct position. Also lightweight 5" external monitor. I really prefer 100% clear 1080p RAW over 4k ProRes with moire, FPN and other digital artifacts. 1080p pros are less battery power, less heat, less data rate and less storage space when shoot RAW.

Currently almost all this can be done with BMMCC equipped with additional accessories and monitor with LUT support, but it takes a lot of time and rises total price up to $2.5K. But it is still less than any current cinema camera on the market that can shoot RAW and ProRes.

BMMCCrig1.jpg
BMMCCrig1.jpg (117.66 KiB) Viewed 563 times

BMMCCrig2.jpg
BMMCCrig2.jpg (102.04 KiB) Viewed 563 times
Offline

Ian Henderson

  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:05 am
  • Location: Cape Town, South Africa

Re: New Camera?

PostSun Aug 13, 2017 4:22 pm

I'm currently looking at building one of these over a GH5. What bits is yours using?
Offline
User avatar

Dmitry Shijan

  • Posts: 193
  • Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:15 pm
  • Location: UA

Re: New Camera?

PostSun Aug 13, 2017 4:40 pm

Ian Henderson wrote:I'm currently looking at building one of these over a GH5. What bits is yours using?


SMALLRIG BMMCC Cage 1773
SmallRig Universal Handle 1984
Side Handle with LANC REC/STOP button (see options here https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=59874)
Arri Rosette Mount Module by RADIOPROEKTOR (currently under development)
Mosaic OLPF
Angle Breakout Expansion Box Module by RADIOPROEKTOR https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=56186
Angle HDMI Clamp Module by RADIOPROEKTOR https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=55124
Lanparte 15mm Single Rod Clamp
CAMVATE 15mm micro Rod Mount
SmallHD 501 monitor
Offline

Ian Henderson

  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:05 am
  • Location: Cape Town, South Africa

Re: New Camera?

PostSun Aug 13, 2017 4:49 pm

Amazing - thank you.
Offline

Denny Smith

  • Posts: 6551
  • Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 4:19 pm
  • Location: USA, Northern Calif.

Re: New Camera?

PostMon Aug 14, 2017 12:25 am

Dmitry, I hope you get your Arri Rosette Mount Module by RADIOPROEKTOR (currently under development) finished soon, it is the only bit I am missing to complete your rig idea. I have worked out a connector for the Small HD monitor to connect it like you show in your illustration above, brilliant idea BTW.
Cheers
Denny
Denny Smith
SHA Productions
Offline
User avatar

Clayton Von Isaacs

  • Posts: 154
  • Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:43 pm

Re: New Camera?

PostMon Aug 14, 2017 5:55 am

Didn't Grant mention in a video that they are going to do it but the technology isn't there yet to do a 4K one, which is what they want to do?
Clayton Von Isaacs
daydreamersproductions.com
Offline

Denny Smith

  • Posts: 6551
  • Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 4:19 pm
  • Location: USA, Northern Calif.

Re: New Camera?

PostMon Aug 14, 2017 4:49 pm

Yes, yes he did... So what Grant was basically saying was, no new Pocket/Micro S16/1-inch sensormtype camera until they could do a 4K one, as BM has no plans (currently) to develop any more HD sensor cameras. As mentioned in another thread, it would be nice if NM would develop the current sensor, or do an upgrade, to get a 2.5K S16/1-inch sensor camera with global shutter, like the Micro was supposed to have when it was first announced.

Unlike SD when HD came out, I (and many others) do not feel HD is dead, it is still a viable resolution, most markets are still using HD, and even Cine projection is still currently 2K. There is more to a good quality image than how many photo-sites you have, GS vs RS, tweaking the 2.5K to get a good full 2K HD image recorded, with well controlled artifacts like FPN, etc is more important than 4K, 6K or even 8K, as most viewers can not tell the difference in a finished video anyway. I can see the need to use higher resolution sensors on cameras for major Cinema release projects, but even Arri is staying below 6K

You could see a difference between SD and HD, but UHD is hard to distinguish from HD, unless you are looking at a grading monitor up close. So why the rush to make everything UHD or higher :?:
I would like to see BM work on improving the IQ of their existing HD and 4.6K sensors, and concentrate on solving the FPN issues, get GS working, and develop a next generation HD 1-inch sensor camera with GS. :roll:
Cheers
Denny Smith
SHA Productions
Offline
User avatar

rick.lang

  • Posts: 7059
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:41 pm
  • Location: Victoria BC Canada

New Camera?

PostWed Aug 16, 2017 6:29 pm

2K/HD delivery isn't going away soon, but very nice options when you capture in a higher resolution like raw 2.5K or 4K.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rick Lang
Offline

Jim Giberti

  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2015 2:03 am

Re: New Camera?

PostWed Aug 16, 2017 9:06 pm

Having added a couple of Micros to our setup I just want to reinforce the comments about it and 1080 here.

Aside from the idiotic little buttons, the Micro can quickly be set up as a world class HD camera. And the value of recording to a larger sensor aside - HD is where all of our work ends up. Outside of Red, Arri and high end Sony cams, there's nothing else like the BM image and codecs; which is of course why so many of us are just waiting for a 4k small BM incarnation when it can be done.

I've always had big camera systems but now I love small cameras and smaller lens systems. UMP is as big as I like, but really only for commercial work, not field work.

Anyway regarding the Micro vs current small sensor 4k options, specifically Sony and GH - there's no comparison in terms of an emotional, cinematic feel, IMO. I've bought two small sensor 4k cameras in the last couple of years and no matter how I tried (and trust me I tried) I couldn't get them to match the BM image quality.

I posted this on the BMC forum recently and may have some value. Because we produce a lot of real time, action and doc work for clients I wanted one, small system, right through to the lens that could move on a monopod at any time. I built a simple Micro, Ikan Vl35, Oly 12-40mm system with a Smallrig cage and LCDVF.

The whole thing was around $2k and it has everything from false color and peaking at the touch of a button to 3:1 raw, slow mo, a (full fram equiv) 35 - 115mm 2.8 lens and it weighs about 2 lbs and cuts beautifully with UMP and any BM footage.
Offline
User avatar

rick.lang

  • Posts: 7059
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:41 pm
  • Location: Victoria BC Canada

New Camera?

PostThu Aug 17, 2017 5:37 am

Jim, when the BMCC was first available, it was apparently hard for most professional cinematographers to take seriously (with some amazingly talented exceptions). The Pocket also seemed interesting but a bit of a holiday toy rather than a serious camera. Of course it sold extremely well anyway. When the mighty URSA camera was released, finally BMD had a camera that generally was well regarded as a serious camera on set, although beginning to be considered a heavy camera as the industry moved towards lighter cameras. The URSA Mini is a lighter camera but not a lightweight camera! However I must admit when I shoot with it, I do get a lot of respect that this is a serious camera. And my results are usually decent and seen in a favorable light.

A 4K/2.5K URSA Micro would still be a welcome camera continuing the trend to lighter highly capable cameras, but the Mini is certainly in a sweet spot getting people's attention if that helps promote your work. The BMD colour science may not be perfect, but in my limited experience as a viewer (not as an operator), only ARRI's images are consistently superior for a digital cinema CMOS Bayer CFA sensor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rick Lang
Online
User avatar

Kim Janson

  • Posts: 515
  • Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2015 6:54 pm
  • Location: Finland

Re: New Camera?

PostThu Aug 17, 2017 6:49 am

In addition to sensor, there is many things that make a great camera, or not just a camera but a video making tool.

I am currently testing Sigma 18-35 and 50-100 1.8 Art lenses on BMMCC with 0.58 SpeedBooster. Very sharp f1.1 lenses even wide open.

The Micro camera expansion port provides control for the camera and lens and that feature is great, but it could be much better. It is not just camera, it is also SpeedBooster and Lens, they all need to work well together.

The taditional way is to have an expensive manual lens with gears, to attach expensive follow focus, zoom and Iris systems. The above mentioned lenses cost 4x as manual T2.0 lenses...and then you need to add the follow focus systems... Why is that. modern lenses have good and smooth operating focus and iris motors. It is just the control that is not that great.

For good lens control, the Camera, the SpeedBooster and the Lens need to support that. Unfortunately that is not quite the case today.

The 50-100 1.8 provides smooth iris control, it still has the steps, but it moves smoothly in between the steps and often this provides a good result. The 18-35 1.8 does not have this. Both of them provide usable, but stepping focus control, not great. Some native MFT lenses provide very good focus control.

So why does this not work, why do we not have excelent lenses like the above mentioned with good electrical control. There is no technical reason for that and it would not reguire any additional HW, just SW.

There is the Canon EF protocols that are not available for Camera, Lens and SpeedBooster manufactures and these manufacturess do not co-operate. Sure, Sigman could make their own protocol that would provide perfect lens control and the same lens could have also the EF protocols. There is no technological reasons not to and they could make this protocol available for SpeedBooster and Camera manufactures and together they could make perfectly working lens control without any expensive, big and bulky follow focus gear. But I gues Sigma wants to sell the same lenses as 4X price for cinema use...

Not many camera manufactures provide any documented interfaces, some provide LANC, but it is really something that should already go a way, it is very limited control it provides.

BMD provides the Expansion port on Micro cameras, but why not on other cameras? BMD provideds Arduino SDI shield and it really provides good control for BMMSC and probaly some other BMD cameras I have not tested, but why do they not provide the same level of control on Expansion port. Again, there is no technological reason for this.

So when thinking the above lenses, the f1.8 versions together cost less than 2000 euros the 2.0T version arounf 8000 euros + folow focus system, same lens, different housing and control, but the 1.8 has already very good housing.

Would it not be great to have a camera that would provide smooth control with the f1.8 version of the lenses :)

Ps. all the above mentioned gear, lens, camera, SpeedBooster is FW upgradable, so if they wanted, they probaly could make it work even with the existing gear.
LeViteZer Smooths the movement, www.levitezer.com
Offline

Jim Giberti

  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2015 2:03 am

Re: New Camera?

PostThu Aug 17, 2017 7:00 pm

rick.lang wrote: The URSA Mini is a lighter camera but not a lightweight camera! However I must admit when I shoot with it, I do get a lot of respect that this is a serious camera. And my results are usually decent and seen in a favorable light.

A 4K/2.5K URSA Micro would still be a welcome camera continuing the trend to lighter highly capable cameras, but the Mini is certainly in a sweet spot getting people's attention if that helps promote your work. The BMD colour science may not be perfect, but in my limited experience as a viewer (not as an operator), only ARRI's images are consistently superior for a digital cinema CMOS Bayer CFA sensor.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Agreed.
I sometimes forget that I'm in a somewhat unique position comared to a lot of BM people I talk with online. Because I own the fiirm that produces the work there isn't anyone I need to be concerned with regarding the tools we use. I'm the arbiter regarding 4k and HD as far as aquisition and delivery.

I love the UMP but I use it with bigger lenses like the 18-35mm and 50-100mm and bigger primes w/SB.
But we shoot so much work that requires a lot of real time aquisition that small and light is just as important. The fact that, in my experience at least, there isn't a small camera that I can shoot straight MFT lenses and fly on monopods, the Zhiyun, small sliders in remote and challenging situations - that can match either the Pocket or Micro - they are the cameras I use for 1/2 of our work. And the fact that the micro can cut so well with the UM makes it ideal.

That's the reason I mention the Micro/12-40mm/Ikan setup. It's a really fast and intuitive system to shoot with in changing conditions, covers a great focal range and w/ the smallrig cage it's rugged, light and small but again - raw, prores, 60p to SD cards.

Yeah, that's why a cropped 4.6 senor version of the micro (just please improve the buttons) would be kind of an ideal next evolution. If it could grow to MFT sensor crop as well as mount would be all the better and probably not unrealsitic.
Offline

Shane McGee

  • Posts: 279
  • Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 1:22 am

Re: New Camera?

PostThu Aug 17, 2017 10:51 pm

Screen Shot 2017-08-17 at 3.46.12 PM.png
Screen Shot 2017-08-17 at 3.46.12 PM.png (225.59 KiB) Viewed 50 times


Probably no real relevance regarding a new camera model but...I wonder why FilmTools is advertising the Micro Cinema Camera as "Limited Quantity Remains"? Sort of implying there will be no more coming? Doubt that.

Return to Cinematography

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Krishna Pada and 13 guests