Things I'd like to see in the next URSA Mini Pro
Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:24 pm
First, great job on the current URSA Mini Pro! I love the fact that a company has finally made a single camera that can be used for film or film-type industrial work and have that look, OR use it for run-and-gun broadcast-type situations (or event shooting comes to mind) simply by attaching a B4 mount. However, as with all cameras, none are flawless, and the current URSA Mini Pro is no exception. Here's all what I'd like to see in the next URSA Mini Pro ("URSA Mini Pro Mark II"?):
* The lighter weight (than typical shoulder-mount cameras) of a little over 5 pounds is good; however, could you try to get that down to around 2-3 pounds, maybe like the Canon C series cameras? If one outfits the Mini Pro with the shoulder kit, lens (especially a pro/broadcast TV servo zoom lens + B4 mount), Anton Bauer battery, and even a basic set of rods and matte box, we're starting to get into similar weight to a traditional broadcast camera. I'd like to see a camera whose weight approaches what JVC has done (e.g., with their GY-HM850U and similar models) or what Sony has done with their PMW-300K1 - very lightweight shoulder cameras but lacking the large sensor that the URSA Mini Pro has. I don't think the camera would necessarily become too front-heavy, as long as Anton Bauer keeps making those large batteries to go on the back (coupled with a wireless mic receiver, etc.). Now if only the manufacturers of lenses, matte boxes, batteries, and wireless mic receivers could reduce their weights!
* Stud on the top of the camera body where the focal plane is, to be able to easily use a cinematographer's tape measure.
* The optional mic mount accessory should mount to the right side of the field viewfinder, not to the top handle. We need space for our hand to grab the handle!
* Speaking of the top handle, it should be longer at the top, even if it has less length at the bottom to mount to the camera body - kind of like those handles on kettle balls or some tea kettles. The logic behind that is so that the operator has ample room to grab onto the camera handle yet still have room for mounting holes at the front and back ends of the handle, leaving the middle of the handle solid for the operator's hand to carry. (Logically, can you carry a camera at all using a handle that could potentially have all kinds of things mounted to EVERY part of the handle anyway, including the part the operator has to carry? Therefore, there should be some part of the handle that's solely dedicated for the operator's hand at all times.)
* All the lens mounts should have a simple quick release mechanism or twist-lock system. No tiny screws to lose! I should be able to go from a B4 lens to Canon EF mount in seconds with no fuss.
* Some have complained that the flip-out LCD covers some critical controls on the body that are in front of the LCD. Put the LCD at the *very most forward part* of the left side of the body and keep all other buttons below and to the back of the LCD on the left side of the body. Whatever is on the backside of the LCD video display (i.e., the timecode and other readouts) should absolutely, completely be duplicated in the OSD of the video display (which I think already is).
* Some have also complained that the optional field viewfinder isn't fully adjustable; it should be made fully adjustable like that of a traditional full-size ENG shoulder camcorder - front-to-back and side-to-side.
* Also, that field viewfinder should have a shoe mount in the front of it for an on-camera light. The shoe mount should be removable, revealing a 1/4"-20 or 3/8"-16 threaded hole as an alternative mount.
* Likewise, toward the back of the camera, there should be a shoe mount as well, for studio viewfinders, removable to reveal a 1/4"-20 or 3/8"-16 threaded hole as an alternative mount.
* You could do the above by moving those top XLR inputs *to the rear of the camera* where they belong - at least where they've belonged for years with traditional ENG shoulder-mount cameras. That brings me to my next point. I don't like anything you have to deal with operationally to be on the top of the camera. You might have the camera mounted fairly high for a high-angle shot - or even if you don't, even if you have the camera mounted eye-level or slightly higher, it's still hard to see what you're doing if you're having to do something with the top of the camera, like in this case, plugging in mics. The rear of the camera is, IMO, THE most convenient place of all to plug in mics; why have so many camera manufacturers of late put the XLR inputs on the side, or in your case, on the top, of the camera?
* For the shoulder mount kit, I noticed in various online demo videos that only the front of the shoulder pad/baseplate attaches to the tripod's VCT plate, but not the back. To the rear of the shoulder pad there is nothing else. Usually on traditional ENG cameras, in addition to the V-lock plate on the front, there is also a little "keyhole" hook on the back that grabs onto a small stud on the back of the VCT plate when latching on/off the camera. This helps increase stability overall. What about this - in addition to the V-lock on the front of your shoulder pad/baseplate, you have a short extended section in the back with the keyhole hook to mount fully onto a standard VCT plate (or, if a standard length VCT plate is too long for your shoulder pad/baseplate, then make your own custom VCT plate like Canon did with their TA-100). Then, have a couple of extra 15mm rod holes in the back of the baseplate for potential additional gear!
I think that's about all I can think of right now, except to suggest maybe a form on your website specifically for product development suggestions (with a dropdown that says something like "Which product would you like to see improvements on?" - that dropdown could also include an "Other/New Product Idea" choice if there's something needed in the pro film/video market that's not being addressed at all). Or instead of a dropdown, there could be checkboxes next to each product, and as soon as you check a box, a suggestion text box for that product appears directly below that item, with a header confirming "Suggestions for URSA Mini Pro" or "Suggestions for DaVinci Resolve", or what-have-you. (That way, you could submit suggestions for multiple products at the same time.)
* The lighter weight (than typical shoulder-mount cameras) of a little over 5 pounds is good; however, could you try to get that down to around 2-3 pounds, maybe like the Canon C series cameras? If one outfits the Mini Pro with the shoulder kit, lens (especially a pro/broadcast TV servo zoom lens + B4 mount), Anton Bauer battery, and even a basic set of rods and matte box, we're starting to get into similar weight to a traditional broadcast camera. I'd like to see a camera whose weight approaches what JVC has done (e.g., with their GY-HM850U and similar models) or what Sony has done with their PMW-300K1 - very lightweight shoulder cameras but lacking the large sensor that the URSA Mini Pro has. I don't think the camera would necessarily become too front-heavy, as long as Anton Bauer keeps making those large batteries to go on the back (coupled with a wireless mic receiver, etc.). Now if only the manufacturers of lenses, matte boxes, batteries, and wireless mic receivers could reduce their weights!
* Stud on the top of the camera body where the focal plane is, to be able to easily use a cinematographer's tape measure.
* The optional mic mount accessory should mount to the right side of the field viewfinder, not to the top handle. We need space for our hand to grab the handle!
* Speaking of the top handle, it should be longer at the top, even if it has less length at the bottom to mount to the camera body - kind of like those handles on kettle balls or some tea kettles. The logic behind that is so that the operator has ample room to grab onto the camera handle yet still have room for mounting holes at the front and back ends of the handle, leaving the middle of the handle solid for the operator's hand to carry. (Logically, can you carry a camera at all using a handle that could potentially have all kinds of things mounted to EVERY part of the handle anyway, including the part the operator has to carry? Therefore, there should be some part of the handle that's solely dedicated for the operator's hand at all times.)
* All the lens mounts should have a simple quick release mechanism or twist-lock system. No tiny screws to lose! I should be able to go from a B4 lens to Canon EF mount in seconds with no fuss.
* Some have complained that the flip-out LCD covers some critical controls on the body that are in front of the LCD. Put the LCD at the *very most forward part* of the left side of the body and keep all other buttons below and to the back of the LCD on the left side of the body. Whatever is on the backside of the LCD video display (i.e., the timecode and other readouts) should absolutely, completely be duplicated in the OSD of the video display (which I think already is).
* Some have also complained that the optional field viewfinder isn't fully adjustable; it should be made fully adjustable like that of a traditional full-size ENG shoulder camcorder - front-to-back and side-to-side.
* Also, that field viewfinder should have a shoe mount in the front of it for an on-camera light. The shoe mount should be removable, revealing a 1/4"-20 or 3/8"-16 threaded hole as an alternative mount.
* Likewise, toward the back of the camera, there should be a shoe mount as well, for studio viewfinders, removable to reveal a 1/4"-20 or 3/8"-16 threaded hole as an alternative mount.
* You could do the above by moving those top XLR inputs *to the rear of the camera* where they belong - at least where they've belonged for years with traditional ENG shoulder-mount cameras. That brings me to my next point. I don't like anything you have to deal with operationally to be on the top of the camera. You might have the camera mounted fairly high for a high-angle shot - or even if you don't, even if you have the camera mounted eye-level or slightly higher, it's still hard to see what you're doing if you're having to do something with the top of the camera, like in this case, plugging in mics. The rear of the camera is, IMO, THE most convenient place of all to plug in mics; why have so many camera manufacturers of late put the XLR inputs on the side, or in your case, on the top, of the camera?
* For the shoulder mount kit, I noticed in various online demo videos that only the front of the shoulder pad/baseplate attaches to the tripod's VCT plate, but not the back. To the rear of the shoulder pad there is nothing else. Usually on traditional ENG cameras, in addition to the V-lock plate on the front, there is also a little "keyhole" hook on the back that grabs onto a small stud on the back of the VCT plate when latching on/off the camera. This helps increase stability overall. What about this - in addition to the V-lock on the front of your shoulder pad/baseplate, you have a short extended section in the back with the keyhole hook to mount fully onto a standard VCT plate (or, if a standard length VCT plate is too long for your shoulder pad/baseplate, then make your own custom VCT plate like Canon did with their TA-100). Then, have a couple of extra 15mm rod holes in the back of the baseplate for potential additional gear!
I think that's about all I can think of right now, except to suggest maybe a form on your website specifically for product development suggestions (with a dropdown that says something like "Which product would you like to see improvements on?" - that dropdown could also include an "Other/New Product Idea" choice if there's something needed in the pro film/video market that's not being addressed at all). Or instead of a dropdown, there could be checkboxes next to each product, and as soon as you check a box, a suggestion text box for that product appears directly below that item, with a header confirming "Suggestions for URSA Mini Pro" or "Suggestions for DaVinci Resolve", or what-have-you. (That way, you could submit suggestions for multiple products at the same time.)