rick.lang wrote:Good catch, Steve. They may claim f/0.95, but it might be a T1.2. Even when you look at the front element, it doesn’t seem large enough for f/0.95. Compare it to other f/0.95 lenses such as the Voitlander to see the proportions don’t seem quite there.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The difference between 1.1 and 0.95 is not much, but yes. I would like to know as well. These are the sorts of lens and image I like (I haven't looked at how technically accurate it is though).
Rick, yes, true, you focus by distance run and gun. Barry Lindon, how what's his name would have loved to have a pocket, maybe Braw and a lens me this. That many candles is a work place health and safety issue.