- Posts: 3362
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:58 am
- Location: Earth
I saw my first 8k yesterday, and was surprised how easily I could see pixels.
I positioned myself in a good angle of view, as you should always in these tests, forgetting about distance to get the most immersive angle of view without looking around the screen. If you need more distance, get a bigger TV.
Yes, it did look better, except for the poor Samsung colour of this year. But looking at the high contrast fade in Samsung logo in tbe top right I could see pixels. I realised the logo must have been lower than 8k. Looking at the logo on a Sony Fullhd TV running the save demo, the logo pixelisation looked similar. The colour on the maybe $600US TV didn't look inferior to the maybe $6600US 8k TV, nor did the contrast on the demo. Are Samsung mad?
Have to wait till I see a proper 8k demo. I have done distance tests to emulate higher resolutions at a good field of view before (for your 4k TV you find the immersive fov sweet spot and stand back double the distance back to get 8k). Several feet is something closer to 120 inch 16:9 (70 inches is a lot narrower fov).
I positioned myself in a good angle of view, as you should always in these tests, forgetting about distance to get the most immersive angle of view without looking around the screen. If you need more distance, get a bigger TV.
Yes, it did look better, except for the poor Samsung colour of this year. But looking at the high contrast fade in Samsung logo in tbe top right I could see pixels. I realised the logo must have been lower than 8k. Looking at the logo on a Sony Fullhd TV running the save demo, the logo pixelisation looked similar. The colour on the maybe $600US TV didn't look inferior to the maybe $6600US 8k TV, nor did the contrast on the demo. Are Samsung mad?
Have to wait till I see a proper 8k demo. I have done distance tests to emulate higher resolutions at a good field of view before (for your 4k TV you find the immersive fov sweet spot and stand back double the distance back to get 8k). Several feet is something closer to 120 inch 16:9 (70 inches is a lot narrower fov).
aIf you are not truthfully progressive, maybe you shouldn't say anything
bTruthful side topics in-line with or related to, the discussion accepted
cOften people deceive themselves so much they do not understand, even when the truth is explained to them
bTruthful side topics in-line with or related to, the discussion accepted
cOften people deceive themselves so much they do not understand, even when the truth is explained to them