Levis (positively) thanks for the examples.
I would be careful of using the word mis-sold. I believe that Braw is a Bayer based codec to add to John's list, just not to the extent of others. Yes, being able to extract the Bayer pattern from it would be good. Maybe BM can add a feature to do that in Resolve in the future to suite some people. To me, it's not really needed.
John Brawley wrote:Oyvind Fiksdal wrote:. It just don’t make any sense. Pretty please, with sugar on top. Show us some evidence this time. Just one.
It's a futile exercise. He won't. You'll just make yourself more frustrated.
I just have it set to ignore.
JB
John, you are doing it again. Let the children get off their lazy behinds and search the past and use forum search, or you find it for them yourself. They are vapor blowing around hot air in discussions against positive people expecting them to do everything for them when they have no problems doing it themselves. Does that sound like people that need mothering? I normally help people, but there are some people who get a thrill from make life burdensome for others. They could actually spend some time doing some work instead. They come along here and spend a $1000 in time producing $100,000 in damages to other people. Storm clouds with no rain.
Ulysses Paiva wrote:John Brawley wrote:Oyvind Fiksdal wrote:. It just don’t make any sense. Pretty please, with sugar on top. Show us some evidence this time. Just one.
It's a futile exercise. He won't. You'll just make yourself more frustrated.
I just have it set to ignore.
JB
Wisest decision.
+1
But you don't, you go from thread to thread hassling people. Like you just did on my other thread, trying to wreck and derail. Now, the other people here being attacked, they deserve some ... peace and quite from you guys. Who are you guys to demand anything, you are not constructive, just negative against people positively objecting or working through things. Is that realistic?
Que Thompson wrote:How do you block topics?
Maybe leaving the forum.
Ulysses Paiva wrote:So far BRAW has been stellar to me. Maybe you guys can be more detailed giving samples and more info on your issues.
Up until now we are only getting claims supported by nothing.
Again, go and look, we are not your slaves. We discussing what we have already seen, what has been posted and discussed in the past, you have no right to dive bomb in and demand we spend time trying to find it for you again. The OP, also has given you easy instructions to iorn a file on your machine and find it, which you should have done within seconds. I spoke to a guy the other night who couldn't believe something existed unless he saw it, as well as in some particular fashion which meant he couldn't view available evidence, la la land with him. Very self centered conceited I think. So, his argument would apply to anything he hasn't seen, including his brain and gravity, and even his own reflection as not direct evidence (he wasn't one of these metaphysical types either, who doubt pain and their own existence). Falls down into a purely negative fantasy argument. Now, I might have rk leave it there for a while. Got to help a friend texting go off the deep end.