Glenn Venghaus wrote:Not defending either software, but any software should be written in such a way that it does not crash when it reads an unsupported or broken file. It should just say : i do not support this or this file is corrupt.
If it crashes its badly written and should be adressed.
It can also be completely avoided - as other products do - by supporting common audio formats like [B]WAV and AIFF.
I never even knew this was an issue until I tried importing a Resolve AAF.
Besides that Resolve has and always had obvious problems with audio export. Thats the only thing i have always struggeled with and where it not for tools like aatranslator or vordio , i would have dropped Resolve like a sack of potatoes and missed out on all the amazingness resolve has given me over the years.
Resolve's AAF export has issues beyond what I outlined in my post, but tools like AAT/Vordio can side-step it by using FCPXML as a source, which completely works around Resolve's mediocre AAF export. That's a workaround, it doesn't fix the inherent problems
This has nothing to do with Resolve "Audio Export," per se.
AAT is $200. Vordio only works for Reaper, IIRC, and I don't/won't use that software.
Maybe one day that part is also adressed and solved permanently, but file exchange between different programs is in its core something not a single program has done or can do 100% correct. Ever.
I'm having trouble supporting this statement, considering every other NLE I've tested - even one that had AAF support implemented and not updated [at all, since then] in 2012 - seems to work. They seem to have gotten it "mostly right" on the first go...
I think that most applications can support Interchange in a workable [and largely compatible] manner, by avoiding obvious "trouble areas." Most DAWs will just ignore features in the AAF file that they don't support. Most NLEs will either default to a more interoperable Audio Format, or give you a choice on which to use in the AAF Export.
Resolve's AAF Export works fine for what it's designed for... Pro Tools users. But this does create problems for a lot of people who do not use Pro Tools.
It will only ever work if every program is the same , has the same features implemented the same way. Thank god they dont./quote]
This makes literally no sense at all.
But thats why standards are never realy standards that cover everything but the lowest common denominator.
[/quote]
This is why supporting older, deprecated standards like OMF is actually a viable alternative, and often a good strategy. The format is basically locked, and doesn't change, which makes it less of a moving target and very reliable for those people who use it. It's why a lot of people still demand them. OMF support in DAWs is fairly robust, at this point...
But you need Premiere Pro (or Avid) to generate that, unless you play interop musical chairs with different formats and utilities to get it out of Resolve.