No no no... Excuse me jp, but that's not correct...
I totally understand what you're talking about, BUT my statement
really did take that into account and moreover, I'd say it may be one of the top assets of the cheesegrater at the end of the day.
I'd say : just do it, and you will see it just works (and quite great).
Drives - from 500 GB to 4To, it's quite the same - don't suck power which would be assigned to PCIe instead.
Yes, 2008 MP had a total amount of 1400 W and its successors had 1000 only, but check out priorities in Apple HW spec, for any MP : 1st, HDs in slot one and 2 (regardless to it's a ssd or not), the rest shared by GPU(s) and global consumption.
Replacing optical hard drive by anything - I mean any HD, 7200, 10 000 rpm or SSD - makes anyone feel smart, but actually it's not such a great idea, because OSX won't use it before slot 1 and/or 2 anyway. Why not for a 4 To backup instead. But I know a bunch of mates who put their system on it : no, definitely it's not a good idea, even when any SSD shows good results/perf. It could be better.
Resolve will happily want around 2 KWatts on maximum render exertion
Hmmmmm... Resolve needs quick access to system disk, quick access to cache disk, quick access to footage; those can consist in 3-4 HD, including internal RAID0 of SSDs. Just a cheap (including in terms of watts consumption) 4 lines USB 3 in a PCIe slot can make it aside.
Anyway, like components temperature, if your computer shows sudden switch off, now you can understand you've reached - and gone beyond - the MP consumption limits
But relax, I've never seen that, and the whole concept is around "switching off before you really break".
Ok, now you think I'm too confident, event totally naive, but I don't think so.
Of course, if your MP has a westmere basis, an external enclosure cannot be a bad idea at the same time