PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are (maybe?) supported

Get answers to your questions about color grading, editing and finishing with DaVinci Resolve.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

Ovi Dan

  • Posts: 58
  • Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2016 7:47 am
  • Location: Seattle, WA

PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are (maybe?) supported

PostMon Oct 09, 2017 10:32 pm

I was planning to build a new DaVinci Resolve workstation using the new AMD Threadripper CPU, but BMD USA support put a damper on things:

Please be aware that Blackmagic Design does not optimize code or tests for the AMD CPUs. Only Intel CPUs are officially recommended. We cannot guarantee trouble free operation of the systems built with or based upon the AMD chipsets and processors.

As far as the graphic cards are concerned both NVIDIA based and AMD based GPUs are supported. The choice is yours in that respect.


Resolve is unstable as it is, so I don't know if I should take a chance on an AMD CPU or not.
Last edited by Ovi Dan on Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Offline
User avatar

Ovi Dan

  • Posts: 58
  • Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2016 7:47 am
  • Location: Seattle, WA

Re: PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are not supported

PostTue Oct 10, 2017 12:23 am

BMD support replied again correcting their initial e-mail:

It came to my attention, since my reply earlier today, that there was some testing done with Threadripper CPUs and that they appear to function well with a current version of DaVinci Resolve.
At this time this is not reflected in the current version of the configuration guide.
If you are experiencing any specific issues with this setup—let us know.
Offline
User avatar

Marc Wielage

  • Posts: 11016
  • Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:46 am
  • Location: Hollywood, USA

Re: PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are (maybe?) support

PostTue Oct 10, 2017 1:17 am

Gee, that's a bit confusing.
marc wielage, csi • VP/color & workflow • chroma | hollywood
Offline

Peter Chamberlain

Blackmagic Design

  • Posts: 13936
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:08 am

Re: PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are (maybe?) support

PostTue Oct 10, 2017 3:41 am

I plan to update the Config guide to inc the AMD Threadripper as we now have one here are as the note says, performance looks ok.
We don't have the EPYC at the moment so no commitment on that one yet.
DaVinci Resolve Product Manager
Offline
User avatar

Frank Glencairn

  • Posts: 1801
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:07 am
  • Location: Germany

Re: PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are (maybe?) support

PostTue Oct 10, 2017 9:07 am

Interesting. I was also leaning towards AMD for my next build, since the current offerings of Intel are not exactly stellar (heat conduction problems, not enough PCI lanes, etc). Especially now, that AMD seems to commit to Thunderbolt. Let's wait and see.
http://frankglencairn.wordpress.com/

I told you so :-)
Offline

Carsten Sellberg

  • Posts: 1463
  • Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:13 am

Re: PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are (maybe?) support

PostTue Oct 10, 2017 9:12 am

Hi Peter.

Will it be possible also to test it with the new NVMe RAID upgrade for X399 chipset from AMD.

https://community.amd.com/community/gam ... 99-chipset

Regards Carsten.
URSA Mini 4.6K
Offline

Andrew Kolakowski

  • Posts: 9211
  • Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:20 am
  • Location: Poland

Re: PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are (maybe?) support

PostTue Oct 10, 2017 10:06 am

This looks cool. One of the first solutions where you can easily use NVMe drives properly.
Offline
User avatar

Frank Glencairn

  • Posts: 1801
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:07 am
  • Location: Germany

Re: PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are (maybe?) support

PostWed Oct 11, 2017 6:38 am

A NVMe drive/raid still doesn't make any sense to me, wehen it comes to video postproduction.
http://frankglencairn.wordpress.com/

I told you so :-)
Offline

Andrew Kolakowski

  • Posts: 9211
  • Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:20 am
  • Location: Poland

Re: PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are (maybe?) support

PostWed Oct 11, 2017 1:31 pm

It doesn't mean it makes no sense at all.
Do you have nicer idea to provide playback of 8K EXRs?
There are projects which need 10GBytes/sec+

For some companies it does make perfect sense.
They work on 8K projects and need realtime playback of DPX or EXRs. You either do it locally or face investment which even top VFX Lodnon houses are not really willing to take atm. Those projects are still to rare.
Offline
User avatar

Thomas Koveleskie

  • Posts: 55
  • Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2017 9:07 pm
  • Location: North Wales, PA - Los Angeles CA

Re: PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are (maybe?) support

PostWed Oct 11, 2017 3:51 pm

I know this thread questions AMD Threadripper line, but I have been using the AMD FX8370 without any problems. Resolve is very stable. Sooner then later I would also like to upgrade to the Threadripper if Resolve doesn't conflict with them.
Resolve Studio 17.4.3 Build 10
MSI B550, Ryzen 7 3700X, GSkill 32GB DDR4-3000, NVIDIA GeForce RTX3060 12GB, Win 10 X64, Sys Drive: Samsung 970 EVO NVMe M.2 500GB SSD, Resolve Media: Inland Platinum NVMe M.2 2TB, Storage: Toshiba internal 5TB SATA
Offline

Dan Sherman

  • Posts: 1185
  • Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 11:07 pm

Re: PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are (maybe?) support

PostWed Oct 11, 2017 4:11 pm

You guys might find this interesting.

AMD 7950X | AMD 7900XTX (23.20.24) | DDR5-6000 CL30-40-40-96 2x32 GB | Multiple PCIe 4.0 X4 NVME | ASUS x670e HERO | Win 11 Pro 23H2 | Resolve Studio 18.6.5 B7
Offline

AlanKafton

  • Posts: 21
  • Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 6:04 am

Re: PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are (maybe?) support

PostFri Oct 13, 2017 5:10 am

Also check out this video...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PphEQqI1Nck
Offline
User avatar

Ovi Dan

  • Posts: 58
  • Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2016 7:47 am
  • Location: Seattle, WA

Re: PSA: AMD Threadripper and Epyc CPUs are (maybe?) support

PostSun Nov 12, 2017 5:22 am

I just completed a Threadripper + GTX 1080 Ti + Decklink 12G build. Everything works fine, but ...

Here is a gotcha which took me many hours to figure out, maybe it will help other people. I used this motherboard: GIGABYTE X399 AORUS Gaming 7 sTR4 AMD X399. If you place the Decklink 12G card on the first PCIe slot the PC will always refuse to boot / POST. I figured out that this motherboard expects the GPU to be placed in the first slot. As soon as I placed the Decklink in the second x16 slot everything started working fine.

Return to DaVinci Resolve

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: asdffghj, Bing [Bot], doo.li_, Nick2021 and 157 guests