Brian Schuck wrote:he monitor i am getting is calibrated for sRGB and rec709 and also has 2 more settings for user, i have a spyder5 i will be using for calibration checks
...and this is where it all went off the rails.
The monitor you are getting can
accept sRGB and rec709 (they are only marginally different, anyway) and has 2 more settings for users, and if you used the Spyder5, you would be good to go if you were creating print output.
Print output is about white balance; inkjet printers, et al. don't worry about black performance, and Spyder-class photosensitometers can't see in the dark. The point overall is that any object out-of-the-box is a raw product, and you are going to have to put some effort into making it work - that is - sharpening you new chef's knife so you can slice things without cutting yourself. I don't buy the "its only for the web" argument at all -- pessimistically, why bother with grading if there is no bar, no criteria?
Micha Clazing wrote:I don't understand the idea that GUI monitor can not be accurate or that it takes a rocket to get there. It would mean that every other field where external monitors are not used (design, comp etc) is not getting it.
That's actually exactly correct. They aren't. But no one knows the difference, nothing to compare anything to, no standards.
jPo, CSI