No 2-pass encoding on free version?

Get answers to your questions about color grading, editing and finishing with DaVinci Resolve.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

Nick Glover

  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:36 am

No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostFri Nov 03, 2017 7:01 pm

Pardon me if this should be obvious, but I have looked over the User Guide and searched all over online and can't seem to figure this out. I am using the latest free version of Resolve. According to the guide, there should be a multi-pass encoding option when using H264 for either QuickTime or MP4, but I am not given this option. I have looked at screenshots from other people and the option is just not there for me. Am I crazy or is this just not an option in the free version? If so, really ought to be mentioned in the guide...

Along similar lines, I noticed the audio for MP4 formats maxes out at a relatively low bitrate of 192 kbps. Is this also a limitation of the free version?

I am currently trying to figure out what the best encoding workflow is for me. I really don't need any of the features of the paid version, so if these are the only things missing, then I would like some suggestions on the best render settings in Resolve for videos that will be re-encoded with Handbrake for upload to YouTube (preferably something high quality and fast, basically). Thanks!
Offline
User avatar

Cary Knoop

  • Posts: 1460
  • Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:35 pm
  • Location: Newark, CA USA

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostFri Nov 03, 2017 7:33 pm

Nick Glover wrote:I would like some suggestions on the best render settings in Resolve for videos that will be re-encoded with Handbrake for upload to YouTube (preferably something high quality and fast, basically). Thanks!

You can encode from Resolve directly for YouTube and other places and 2-pass is not going to help here anyway. 2-pass is only useful if you need a fixed length encoding.

I would recommend H.264, MP4 using Network Optimization enabled with automatic keyframes and frame reordering enabled.

For HD I would not go over 20Mbps and for 4K I would stay around 60-80Mbps. Anything above those values is not going to improve the quality of your video.

With respect to audio, 192 kbps is just fine, your ears will not hear the difference if higher bitrates are used.

Of course for editing and mastering you would want to use higher bitrates but then you would not want to use aac anyway.
Offline

Nick Glover

  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:36 am

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostFri Nov 03, 2017 7:41 pm

I usually use 2-pass VBR to keep the file sizes down without hurting the quality. Most of the file sizes I have been getting so far are quite large compared to what I used to get with Premiere. Makes a big difference with upload times. Just to confirm, is 2-pass even an option for me in the free version? Does not seem to be.

I'm a musician and recording engineer, so I promise I can hear the difference :p I prefer 256 kbps as a good balance between quality and size.
Offline
User avatar

Charles Bennett

  • Posts: 6291
  • Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:55 am
  • Location: United Kingdom

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostFri Nov 03, 2017 8:34 pm

If you render as an h264 .mov file you can set the audio to linear PCM 24bit 48k. Make sure that if using the .mov format and the video is destined for YouTube, that Frame re-ordering is set to OFF.
Last edited by Charles Bennett on Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Resolve Studio 19.0b1 build 20
Dell XPS 8700 i7-4790, 24GB RAM, 2 x Evo 860 SSDs, GTX1060/6GB (551.86 Studio Driver), Win10 Home (22H2), Speed Editor, Faderport mk1, Eizo ColorEdge CS230 + BenQ GW2270 + Samsung SA200, Canon C100mk2, Zoom H2n.
Offline

Nick Glover

  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:36 am

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostFri Nov 03, 2017 8:36 pm

To clarify, 256 kbps is the AUDIO bitrate, as opposed to the apparent 192 kbps limit. I normally upload 1080p videos, so I generally shoot for an average of around 16-20 mbps for the video bitrate. Having said that, I don't see any options in Resolve to actually control that number, just generic "High" "Medium" etc settings.
Offline
User avatar

Charles Bennett

  • Posts: 6291
  • Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:55 am
  • Location: United Kingdom

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostFri Nov 03, 2017 8:44 pm

The render bit rate is set on the deliver page. Next to Quality you can select "Restrict to" and set the bit rate you require.
Resolve Studio 19.0b1 build 20
Dell XPS 8700 i7-4790, 24GB RAM, 2 x Evo 860 SSDs, GTX1060/6GB (551.86 Studio Driver), Win10 Home (22H2), Speed Editor, Faderport mk1, Eizo ColorEdge CS230 + BenQ GW2270 + Samsung SA200, Canon C100mk2, Zoom H2n.
Offline

Nick Glover

  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:36 am

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostFri Nov 03, 2017 8:49 pm

Charles Bennett wrote:The render bit rate is set on the deliver page. Next to Quality you can select "Restrict to" and set the bit rate you require.


True. No way to specify a target bitrate, though :( I guess I am just used to how Premiere does things (a target and a maximum bitrate) and struggling to come to grips with how much less control there is over the encoding in Resolve (I do rather like it as an NLE otherwise, though). Do you have any insight as to the 2-pass option on free vs paid? Or the 192 kbps limit on free vs paid? No one seems to :(
Offline
User avatar

Charles Bennett

  • Posts: 6291
  • Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:55 am
  • Location: United Kingdom

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostFri Nov 03, 2017 8:52 pm

The Restrict To option is the target bit rate. Double click on the figure in the box and enter the number you require.
I upload to YouTube at 35000kbps with audio between 1500 and 2300kbps.
Resolve Studio 19.0b1 build 20
Dell XPS 8700 i7-4790, 24GB RAM, 2 x Evo 860 SSDs, GTX1060/6GB (551.86 Studio Driver), Win10 Home (22H2), Speed Editor, Faderport mk1, Eizo ColorEdge CS230 + BenQ GW2270 + Samsung SA200, Canon C100mk2, Zoom H2n.
Offline

Nick Glover

  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:36 am

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostFri Nov 03, 2017 8:59 pm

I would think "restrict to" would be the maximum bitrate, which is different from the target bitrate. I would normally set the target to 16 mbps and the maximum to 20 mbps. It is my understanding that this sets the average bitrate (of a variable bitrate file, which is my preference) to 16 mbps, but it can dip above or below that. Perhaps you are talking about constant bitrate instead? I have no desire to work with CBR files as they are unnecessarily huge for my purposes.
Offline
User avatar

Charles Bennett

  • Posts: 6291
  • Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:55 am
  • Location: United Kingdom

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostFri Nov 03, 2017 9:05 pm

Yes I use Variable bit rate. With the Restrict To set to 35000kbps, my last video had a data rate of 34959kbps with a total bit rate, including the audio, of 37264kbps.
Resolve Studio 19.0b1 build 20
Dell XPS 8700 i7-4790, 24GB RAM, 2 x Evo 860 SSDs, GTX1060/6GB (551.86 Studio Driver), Win10 Home (22H2), Speed Editor, Faderport mk1, Eizo ColorEdge CS230 + BenQ GW2270 + Samsung SA200, Canon C100mk2, Zoom H2n.
Offline

Nick Glover

  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:36 am

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostFri Nov 03, 2017 9:21 pm

Charles Bennett wrote:Yes I use Variable bit rate. With the Restrict To set to 35000kbps, my last video had a data rate of 34959kbps with a total bit rate, including the audio, of 37264kbps.


Right, so the "restrict to" is the maximum, not the target bit rate. The manual confirms this, but the manual also has plenty of other blatantly false information, such as saying that AAC is only available on Mac (it isn't). I do not understand why there is so much misinformation and why they do not make the free vs studio differences clear. There is no full list anywhere, it's crazy to me.
Offline
User avatar

Charles Bennett

  • Posts: 6291
  • Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:55 am
  • Location: United Kingdom

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostFri Nov 03, 2017 9:26 pm

The only place I have seen the differences listed is in the download section of the BM site.
Resolve Studio 19.0b1 build 20
Dell XPS 8700 i7-4790, 24GB RAM, 2 x Evo 860 SSDs, GTX1060/6GB (551.86 Studio Driver), Win10 Home (22H2), Speed Editor, Faderport mk1, Eizo ColorEdge CS230 + BenQ GW2270 + Samsung SA200, Canon C100mk2, Zoom H2n.
Offline
User avatar

Miltos Pilalitos

  • Posts: 717
  • Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:42 am
  • Location: Athens, Greece

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostFri Nov 03, 2017 10:13 pm

I am working on the studio version (v14) and there is no 2 pass encoding either. (Win10 64bit)

I have asked in this forum too about this subject but got zero replies. I have no idea why i don't have those settings on my Resolve Deliver Page when they are pictured in the manual.
Windows 10 x64 • Threadripper 1950x • 64GB RAM • RTX 4090 24GB • Latest Nvidia drivers
Fusioneer since Fu4.0 • Resolver since v9
Offline

Peter Cave

  • Posts: 3802
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:45 am
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostSat Nov 04, 2017 1:15 am

Perhaps providing system and Resolve version info may help us help you?
Resolve 18.6.6 Mac OSX 14.4.1 Sonoma
Mac Studio Max 32GB
Offline

Nick Glover

  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:36 am

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostSat Nov 04, 2017 1:06 pm

It is the latest version, 14.0.1 I believe. I do know it is the latest version because I updated it maybe 2 weeks ago. I'm on Windows 10. If it matters, I upgraded from the beta, which also did not have the 2-pass option.
Offline

Ignacio de La Cierva

  • Posts: 163
  • Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2016 12:20 pm

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostMon Nov 06, 2017 8:20 pm

I upgraded today from 12.5 to 14.0.1

No variable bitrate option neither running under Win7 Pro 64.
Offline

Nick Glover

  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:36 am

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostWed Nov 08, 2017 7:32 pm

For anyone still curious, I contacted Blackmagic and apparently the Windows version of the software just doesn't have support for 2-pass encoding or higher audio bitrates. Maybe a future release will.
Offline
User avatar

Jack Swart

  • Posts: 769
  • Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2014 8:09 pm
  • Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostWed Nov 08, 2017 7:58 pm

I always output a ProRes master file and then use Handbrake to encode an MP4 output.

It is very fast and has all the adjustment controls you could ever need including 2 pass encoding and bit rate limits.

It also produces the best images at low bit rates that I seen (IMHO).

And its free.

Mac, Windows and Linux

https://handbrake.fr/downloads.php
DR Studio 18.6.3 b19, OS 13.2.1
2023 Mac Studio M1 Ultra, 20 core CPU, 48 core GPU, 128 GB ram
BM 3G ultra studio, 12TB SSDs in raid 0, 16TB HDD backup, 56TB archive server.
Tangent Elements panel, TV logic XVW-245W
Offline
User avatar

Charles Bennett

  • Posts: 6291
  • Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:55 am
  • Location: United Kingdom

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostWed Nov 08, 2017 9:24 pm

Nick, as I said before, you can use linear PCM audio with h264. Instead of 192kbps, a 24bit 48k wav file will give you a bit rate of around 1500kbps. True there is no 2 pass h264 encoding, but I haven't found this to be a problem. This is with the free version on Win10.
Resolve Studio 19.0b1 build 20
Dell XPS 8700 i7-4790, 24GB RAM, 2 x Evo 860 SSDs, GTX1060/6GB (551.86 Studio Driver), Win10 Home (22H2), Speed Editor, Faderport mk1, Eizo ColorEdge CS230 + BenQ GW2270 + Samsung SA200, Canon C100mk2, Zoom H2n.
Offline

Nick Glover

  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:36 am

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostWed Nov 08, 2017 9:58 pm

Charles Bennett wrote:Nick, as I said before, you can use linear PCM audio with h264. Instead of 192kbps, a 24bit 48k wav file will give you a bit rate of around 1500kbps. True there is no 2 pass h264 encoding, but I haven't found this to be a problem. This is with the free version on Win10.


Yes, I am aware, but this results in much larger file sizes. The point of compressing, particularly with 2-pass VBR, is to maintain quality while reducing file size. I do not WANT linear PCM. I WANT high quality compressed audio.
Offline
User avatar

Frank Glencairn

  • Posts: 1801
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:07 am
  • Location: Germany

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostThu Nov 09, 2017 2:55 pm

You guys may wanna check this out, to find the best parameters

https://mattgadient.com/x264-vs-x265-vs ... -examples/
http://frankglencairn.wordpress.com/

I told you so :-)
Offline

jeffsargeant

  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:24 pm

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostThu Nov 09, 2017 4:56 pm

Screen Shot 2017-11-09 at 8.52.33 AM.JPG
Screen Shot 2017-11-09 at 8.52.33 AM.JPG (110.87 KiB) Viewed 11008 times

Screen Shot 2017-11-09 at 8.52.23 AM.JPG
Screen Shot 2017-11-09 at 8.52.23 AM.JPG (112.64 KiB) Viewed 11008 times


There is single Pass and Multiple Pass on the 14.01 Free version.
I assume multiple pass will give you 2 passes.
iMac (Retina 5K, 27-Inch, Late 2015
OSX 10.12.6
Processor 3.3 GHz i5
Memory 24 GB 1867 MHz DDR3
Graphics AMD Radeon R9 M395 2048 MB
Headphone out to Mackie CR3 Powered Reference Monitors

Jeff Sargeant
Videographer @
Flowmaster/Hurst/B&M
Hayden, ID
Offline

Nick Glover

  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:36 am

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostThu Nov 09, 2017 4:59 pm

Please read the above. I have confirmed with Blackmagic that the option does not exist for Windows users on the latest version.
Offline

Norman Black

  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:26 am
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostThu Nov 09, 2017 5:36 pm

My guess is that on the Mac that selection item shown (multi-pass etc) is using the OS video subsystem and the system internal AVC encoder. No such animal on Windows. Therefore all we have is the native AVC encoder used by Resolve in libavcodec, which I believe is likely OpenH264.

As AVC encoders go, OpenH264 is pretty weak.
Resolve 16b3, Windows 10 1803
i7-4770K 4.0 GHz, 16GB ram, GTX 1080
512GB system SSD, 1TB 7200rpm HDD
Offline
User avatar

Charles Bennett

  • Posts: 6291
  • Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:55 am
  • Location: United Kingdom

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostThu Nov 09, 2017 7:10 pm

By definition, compressed audio files are not high quality because of the amount of data thrown away. The only way is to use a lossless compression scheme such as Apple Lossless, FLAC , Dolby True HD, or Meridian Lossless Packing. As far as I know none of these are integrated with a video stream.
Resolve Studio 19.0b1 build 20
Dell XPS 8700 i7-4790, 24GB RAM, 2 x Evo 860 SSDs, GTX1060/6GB (551.86 Studio Driver), Win10 Home (22H2), Speed Editor, Faderport mk1, Eizo ColorEdge CS230 + BenQ GW2270 + Samsung SA200, Canon C100mk2, Zoom H2n.
Offline

Reynaud Venter

  • Posts: 5031
  • Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 9:34 am

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostThu Nov 09, 2017 7:47 pm

Charles Bennett wrote:The only way is to use a lossless compression scheme such as Apple Lossless, FLAC , Dolby True HD, or Meridian Lossless Packing.
Dolby True HD actually uses MLP as the basis for its compression scheme.

There is DTS-HD Master Audio, of course, which is also lossless.
⟦ Mac Pro 7,1 Rack ⊕ 16-core 3.2GHz ⊕ 32GB RAM ⊕ Radeon 580X • Resolve Studio 19.0 • macOS 14.4.1 ⟧
⟦ Fairlight Studio Console ⊕ Fairlight Audio Accelerator ⊕ Merging Hapi • Anubis • Ravenna CoreAudio VAD ⟧
Offline

Nick Glover

  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:36 am

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostThu Nov 09, 2017 7:55 pm

Charles Bennett wrote:By definition, compressed audio files are not high quality because of the amount of data thrown away. The only way is to use a lossless compression scheme such as Apple Lossless, FLAC , Dolby True HD, or Meridian Lossless Packing. As far as I know none of these are integrated with a video stream.


Compressed audio files are by definition not highest quality. That does not mean they can not be high quality. No matter how you export, when uploading to YouTube, all videos will be transcoded (and therefore compressed again). I suggest that you look over the official YouTube recommendations for videos: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/1722171?hl=en

I am not trying to be argumentative, but you have been rather combative on this and not once attempted to even address the core issue of my post, which was the fact that options which are stated to exist in the manual do not seem to exist. I did not ask for your subjective analysis of the validity of those options. Since I have now confirmed that both the multiple passes and the higher audio quality are indeed not in the Windows version (likely because of the issues mentioned above), I believe we can either close the thread or move back to discussing the second part of my question: with those options not available, what settings do people recommend for exporting when the intention is to encode again using an external encoder like HandBrake. For example, Jack mentioned he exports to ProRes.

(Also, yes, you can integrate FLAC and others into an MP4 video)
Offline

Ignacio de La Cierva

  • Posts: 163
  • Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2016 12:20 pm

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostSat Nov 11, 2017 12:40 am

Handbrake can not read DNxHR files. Last week I spent a few hours doing tests and my only solution to create a playable 2160p MP4 video was exporting fromResolve a huge AVY YUW uncompressed master. About 170GB for a 5 minute video.

No ProRes output from Resolve under Windows, I'm afraid.

I'm very interested in this second part of the thread.
Offline

Norman Black

  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:26 am
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostSat Nov 11, 2017 2:11 am

Ignacio de La Cierva wrote:Handbrake can not read DNxHR files.


ffmpeg can handle DNxHR and Cineform. You can use the Dali's Mustache converter which is a front end to ffmpeg. It's not free, $25US, but worth mentioning. Yes, a weird name for the product.

Of course you can use ffmpeg directly. For example
Code: Select all
ffmpeg.exe -i %1 -c:v libx264 -preset:v medium -profile:v high -crf 20 -pix_fmt yuv420p -c:a aac b:a 192k -chunk_size 64K "%~dpn1.mp4"


Choose your desired preset, crf and audio bitrate value.

If you need to target a specific bitrate then you can try the following verses crf.
e.g. -b:v 35M -maxrate 45M

35Mbps average and 45Mbps max. Choose your desired bitrate settings.
I don't have any two pass ffmpeg x264 scripts laying around, so can't help there.
Resolve 16b3, Windows 10 1803
i7-4770K 4.0 GHz, 16GB ram, GTX 1080
512GB system SSD, 1TB 7200rpm HDD
Offline

Jason Tackaberry

  • Posts: 211
  • Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:34 am

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostSat Nov 11, 2017 2:14 am

Norman Black wrote:ffmpeg can handle DNxHR and Cineform. You can use the Dali's Mustache converter which is a front end to ffmpeg.
I don't think Dali Convert supports Cineform. (It does do DNxHR though.)
Resolve Studio 18.0.2 | Windows 10 x64 (21H2) | AMD Threadripper 5950X | 64GB | NVIDIA 3080 Ti (516.94)
Offline

Norman Black

  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:26 am
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA

Re: No 2-pass encoding on free version?

PostSat Nov 11, 2017 10:47 pm

Dali Convert does support Cineform. Input only.
Resolve 16b3, Windows 10 1803
i7-4770K 4.0 GHz, 16GB ram, GTX 1080
512GB system SSD, 1TB 7200rpm HDD

Return to DaVinci Resolve

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], randyd, Robert Niessner, W3C [Validator], Yahoo [Bot] and 236 guests