DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

Get answers to your questions about color grading, editing and finishing with DaVinci Resolve.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

Julien Gignoux

  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 12:50 pm

DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostTue Jun 19, 2018 2:44 pm

Hello,

I have customers that asked us to create specifically DPX v2.0 files (that conforms to SMPTE Standard 268M-2003). However, Resolve 14 (and Resolve 15 Beta) seems to create only DPX v1.0 files.
I understand that it changes the header with additionnal data and a better structure of the header.

When you import DPX 2.0 files into Resolve, they are imported ok.
But is there a way to create this kind of filess in the deliver tab?
If not, is it something in the roadmap?

Thanks for your help.

Regards.

Julien GIGNOUX
Vectracom
Offline

Peter Chamberlain

Blackmagic Design

  • Posts: 13944
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:08 am

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostWed Jun 20, 2018 1:48 am

Can u ask your customer what application needs the dpx in that format?
Give dpx is used daily in thousands of renders it’s an interesting request
DaVinci Resolve Product Manager
Offline

Julien Gignoux

  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 12:50 pm

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostWed Jun 20, 2018 9:50 am

I don't think it's for a specific software.
The files are dedicated to be archived.

So for preservation consideration, our customer wants to go with the latest recommandations from the standard organizations (SMPTE).
Offline

Peter Chamberlain

Blackmagic Design

  • Posts: 13944
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:08 am

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostThu Jun 21, 2018 9:48 am

Ah, well we dont render in that format as its not used in the industry. Well hardly used.
Also, if they truly want to archive, it usually in EXR.
DaVinci Resolve Product Manager
Online
User avatar

Uli Plank

  • Posts: 21790
  • Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:48 am
  • Location: Germany and Indonesia

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostThu Jun 21, 2018 10:26 am

These days it would be a good idea to use ACES standards for archives.
Now that the cat #19 is out of the bag, test it as much as you can and use the subforum.

Studio 18.6.6, MacOS 13.6.6, 2017 iMac, 32 GB, Radeon Pro 580
MacBook M1 Pro, 16 GPU cores, 32 GB RAM and iPhone 15 Pro
Speed Editor, UltraStudio Monitor 3G
Offline
User avatar

Marc Wielage

  • Posts: 11053
  • Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:46 am
  • Location: Hollywood, USA

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostThu Jun 21, 2018 11:26 am

Uli Plank wrote:These days it would be a good idea to use ACES standards for archives.

Which ACES? There are several to choose from. (You see the problem.)
marc wielage, csi • VP/color & workflow • chroma | hollywood
Offline

Hendrik Proosa

  • Posts: 3055
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:53 am
  • Location: Estonia

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostThu Jun 21, 2018 11:55 am

Marc Wielage wrote:Which ACES? There are several to choose from. (You see the problem.)

Used ACES version should be written to metadata. This way whichever was used, it is possible to arrive to common ground and work from there.
I do stuff
Offline
User avatar

MikeRochefort

  • Posts: 156
  • Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 2:48 am
  • Location: Boston

Re: DPX v2.0 vs DPX 1.0

PostThu Jun 21, 2018 3:29 pm

Marc Wielage wrote:
Uli Plank wrote:These days it would be a good idea to use ACES standards for archives.

Which ACES? There are several to choose from. (You see the problem.)


It’s actually pretty straightforward. ACES2065-1 is the format for archival purposes and data handoffs.

Cheers,
Mike
https://michaelrochefort.com/
3D Lookdev, Compositing, and Sysadmin
Fusion Studio 9.0.2
Fusion 16 Studio
RHEL 7.6 | Intel i7-6850K | 32GB memory | 3x GTX 1070 | 418.56

Return to DaVinci Resolve

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AlbionDrones, c.lday44, Daniel Batinic, Glenn Sakatch, MSNbot Media, owanke, Sibtain, Toby Kahler and 311 guests