- Posts: 78
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:44 pm
- Real Name: Ben Traje
Every vendor has to set a price that makes sense for them economically.
If BMD can make money (or can afford to lose money) on Fusion Studio for $300 directly or indirectly, they can set their price accordingly.
For Mocha there is a smaller market by its very definition. Not everyone who is working in post *needs* the tools Mocha provides, so whatever they spend on development they have to recover through other ways. In their case higher prices for the software, since they have no alternative stream of revenue (cameras, control panels etc) to compensate for that.
Also, if your own revenue as a studio depends on the speed at which you can work, something that costs $695 isn't expensive if it speeds up the artist's workflow so they can get their work done quicker.
If you have a roto artis that costs $ 400 a day (I have no idea what the rate is) and they can get their work done 3 days earlier because of the speed Mocha brings, you (as the person who hires them) will have saved $ 1200. That's Fusion *and* Mocha saved within three days.
If you look at it percentagewise, you could compare it with coffee you brew at home (which is about $0.25 tops and the one you buy in a cafe (remember those?) which goes for $ 3.00 easily a 12 times increase in price for what is essentially the same product.
So the short version is: plug-ins aren't expensive, Fusion Studio is cheap.