Michael Moore wrote:Dan Sherman wrote:What you want is a true 10bit monitor with 100% coverage of the SRG/rec.709 color space in the 32" size range.
Benq SW 271 is not good to video because is 27" and not 32" monitor? Why Benq claime this monitor for photography and not for video? What make a monitor to be for video and not photo?
The 271 can be used for video editing, but at 27" the pixel density is 163 PPi. At that destiny it can be hard to see edge details without zooming in. at 32" ppi drops to 137, while still not great it's better. If you get a LG OLED B9 like Andrew mentioned they start at 55" so ppi is 80, and thus it's very easy to see details, and its also the size screen people are going to be watching on in their homes.
A lot of professional colorists have relatively crappy monitors, but a really nice calibrated tv. For example take a look at this marketing photo pulled directly from BM website. Two random monitors that aren't even the same size or model, and then a really nice TV hung on the wall behind at a realistic viewing distance. Unless your a professional at a decent level, you propbabbly don't have the $$$ or space for a setup like this. Thus, most amateurs or lower level professionals go with computer monitors, and above 32" quallity really starts to drop off.

The 271 is more photographer oriented because it has 99% coverage of Adobe RGB. That's a color Space that's more important to photographers who are actually going to be printing their work.
Take a look at this color space chart. A simple way to think of it, is the bigger the triangle the more its going to cost you.
Michael Moore wrote: What about the Asus PA329Q? Is moore good to video editing compare with Benq SW 271?
size wise it is.