dotes wrote:Some amusing "pro" condescension in this thread. The more cameras supported out of the box, the better.
Not if they suck. The downward spiral of the industry in general isn't helped by people using $995 cameras on supposedly "pro" productions.
I don't have problems with people shooting fancy home movies, student projects, or YouTube videos on toy cameras. But I think we have some major issues with
unrealistic expectations, especially for a camera this cheap and crappy.
dotes wrote:Transcoding into any compressed codec is unnecessary AND diminishes image quality. In particular, transcoding into prores 422 increases filesize pointlessly. Useless if your hardware can handle editing native camera long gop files.
Speaking as a post supervisor, I have not found this to be a problem. One can make an argument that using a video format native to the OS (like ProRes in the case of Mac) lightens the CPU load, particularly in comparison to H.264 or other DSLR formats.
I've done a couple of very small micro-budgeted features shooting on Canon 7D's and 5D's where we bumped up to ProRes 422 HQ as part of the process and it worked fine. No issues with file storage, multiple layers, lots of corrections. And all our audio was done with an external sound recorder, so that was flawless.