Sat Dec 15, 2012 11:04 am
Thanks for your feedback - greatly appreciated.
I'm more concerned about performance than redundancy, as we always have a backup of all the media and projects anyway (so if a drive did go down we could just replace the faulty drive, format the RAID, then copy across the media again - which would probably be faster than a RAID re-build anyway).
I guess I'll just have to do some tests!
I'm assuming that RAID-6 will have slightly faster read times than RAID-5, and RAID-5 will have slightly faster write times than RAID-6 - but I'm very curious to see how RAID-0 would perform in comparison.
I'm also really curious to see at what point adding drives to a RAID-0 array will start to have less of an affect (i.e. it might be better to have two sets of four drives in a RAID-0 array rather than have eight drives in a RAID-0 array). I guess it will all depend on how the Accusys RAID controller has been optimised - as I'd imagine most of the time end-users will be using RAID5/6.
I'll do some tests later next week - but if anyone has some insight, let me know!
Thanks!