Page 1 of 1

Cintel film scanner

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2015 7:58 pm
by Luke Hynde
Does anyone here have any real world experience with this scanner? Does it ship with both 16mm and 35mm gates?

Any thoughts and ideas you, a user with experience have, would be greatly appreciated,

Thanks,

L

Re: Cintel film scanner

PostPosted: Sat Dec 19, 2015 9:01 am
by Andreas Caemmerer
I would be interested too!

I was told that the 16mm gate is optional.

@BMD: Will "Rivival Dirt and Dust" be also available for .cri files?

Thanks,
Andreas

Re: Cintel film scanner

PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 4:30 pm
by Gary Adams
Hello. As Andreas said, the 16mm gate is optional. Currently, there is no Revival Dirt and Dust capability with the scanner.

Regards, Gary

Re: Cintel film scanner

PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:25 pm
by Andreas Caemmerer
Anyone with hands-on experience? I've read about issues with the stabilisation and fixed pattern noise due to the 4k sensor (same as in the BMPC 4K). I don't dare to ask about the 4.6K sensor...

Thanks,
Andreas

Re: Cintel film scanner

PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 11:11 pm
by waltervolpatto
Gary Adams wrote:Hello. As Andreas said, the 16mm gate is optional. Currently, there is no Revival Dirt and Dust capability with the scanner.

Regards, Gary


Gary, is it unthinkable to have 8mm/super 8 gate?

Re: Cintel film scanner

PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 1:33 am
by Badalic Dubravko
waltervolpatto wrote:
Gary Adams wrote:Hello. As Andreas said, the 16mm gate is optional. Currently, there is no Revival Dirt and Dust capability with the scanner.

Regards, Gary


Gary, is it unthinkable to have 8mm/super 8 gate?


There is no practical use of it.
Since there is no possibility of adjusting optical magnification, resolution vs film size is fixed at approx 154.3 pixels/mm (S35mm 3840x2880 px on film size 24.98x18.66mm, etc..) so mathematically on S8 mm gate it should be something like 894x618 px which is far below HD.
So no practical use of it, even 16mm is on threshold of practical usability, just little over HD (1582x1154 px)

Otherwise I have it about a year with 35 & 16mm gates and it works fine. Best value for money I know for now.
Pretty fine film handling, even gentle for archival footage, nice speed (realtime) for everyday use etc., but BMD should work on camera and debayering controls, (there is no any). It is not comparable to Arriscan, it i s different worlds.
If U need 8, S8, go to MWA or Muller Filmfabriek (just ordered one)

Re: Cintel film scanner

PostPosted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 8:25 pm
by Colin Barrett
waltervolpatto wrote:
Gary Adams wrote:Hello. As Andreas said, the 16mm gate is optional. Currently, there is no Revival Dirt and Dust capability with the scanner.

Regards, Gary


Gary, is it unthinkable to have 8mm/super 8 gate?


I've had a lot of Standard-8 and Super-8mm material frame-scanned on a MWA digital scanner in the couple of years and it's exceptionally good. And it handles Mag and Opt audio!

Re: Cintel film scanner

PostPosted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 8:29 pm
by waltervolpatto
Colin Barrett wrote:
waltervolpatto wrote:
Gary Adams wrote:Hello. As Andreas said, the 16mm gate is optional. Currently, there is no Revival Dirt and Dust capability with the scanner.

Regards, Gary


Gary, is it unthinkable to have 8mm/super 8 gate?


I've had a lot of Standard-8 and Super-8mm material frame-scanned on a MWA digital scanner in the couple of years and it's exceptionally good. And it handles Mag and Opt audio!

Do you have a link?

Re: Cintel film scanner

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:03 am
by Colin Barrett
waltervolpatto wrote: Do you have a link?


Here goes: https://www.mwa-nova.com

They have some interesting new products coming on stream soon. I was looking at their gear at the IBC convention in Amsterdam last Saturday (Sept 16).

Re: Cintel film scanner

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:22 pm
by waltervolpatto
THANKS!