Joshua_G wrote:Mattias Murhagen wrote: Having control over playback level isn't a bad thing and should be thought of as separate from the "mix" or "master". I'm assuming he meant controlling the total level of all channels together going to the speakers rather than adjust levels as way to actually "mix" everything.
In addition it is actually quite convenient to have a central place where adjustments to the playback environment can be done, be they level matching channels (not mix) when calibrating, EQing or delaying signals.
Have you ever done 5.1 audio mix on a pro level, or do you speak out of what seems 'logical' to you?
I'm speaking as a professional re-recording engineer that has done and is doing 5.1 work as well as stereo.
Joshua_G wrote:Adjusting separately the level of the different audio channels on the fly is much like playing with the brightness and contrast controls of the reference video monitor while doing color grades.
* edit; not "on the fly" for "the different audio channels". Static for relative levels and every now and then for all.
I think "much like" is too strong a word. I don't disagree that monitoring at soft versus loud gives a different impression on various systems, but we should think about this practically. If the person is spending part of the time dealing with picture then it isn't really necessary to play back at whatever we consider to be maximum playback level all the time. And if it isn't necessary all the time it's better to save ones ears and therefore lower the playback volume and save ears for later. In addition to that even when mixing - especially depending on workflow - it's often good to monitor on a level that is lower than final level.
I've worked on plenty of shows, mostly sports, where the loudness is pretty consistent throughout the show and the people reviewing it want the mix played back loud in the room. To save my ears I'll do most work at below that final monitoring level and bump it up when I review myself and finally when I review with the producer.
All these changes in monitoring playback level is and should be done after the mix as far as signal flow goes. At home on Nuendo I use the built in monitoring section to do this as it is non-destructive for the mix. In studios we typically have a monitor controller by Dangerous or StudioConn or similar and those controllers provide, well, 'control' over playback levels.
Joshua_G wrote:Attaining proper balance between the different audio channels should be done once, in the computer, when making the setup. It can be redone if the speakers, or their location, is changed. The overall volume of all the channels is also done within the computer and can be changed on the fly.
BTW, I'm a retired sound engineer.
If this cannot be done within Resolve then obviously doing it outside is necessary.
If overall volume isn't easily changed within Resolve then doing it outside is necessary.
If both is possible within Resolve it might still be more convenient to do it outside the box;
- it gives you some "protection" against someone messing with the settings without you knowing it, which could be more likely since more people might be working on that same system, and that software might be upgraded more frequently.
- it might be more convenient to simply extend your arm real quick and turn a real knob to change the level.