Better still image vs image sequence handling

  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

Darius Family

  • Posts: 51
  • Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:09 am
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia

Better still image vs image sequence handling

PostSun Jan 26, 2020 3:58 am

At present, importing an AAF or XML with 'Import clips automatically' will result in images being brought in as image sequences.

This is problematic working on documentaries where we have lots of photos being referenced, and the photos are numbered sequentially.

Resolve interprets these as images sequences and thus we end up with lots of 'images sequences' in the media pool.

This is two feature requests:
  1. Improve the handling of image vs image sequence import
  2. Add option in project settings to set the media browser default to 'Show as individual frames'

This is one of several lacking features and bugs that have a large time impact on the conform process. I'd be very happy to share some insights into the conform process on feature documentaries with any of the BMD resolve team members.
System Specs: Win10 64bit 10.0.17763 Build 17763 • Intel i7-6700k • 32GB RAM • GTX 980Ti 6GB
Offline

kinvermark

  • Posts: 289
  • Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 5:04 pm
  • Real Name: Mark Wilson

Re: Better still image vs image sequence handling

PostSun Jan 26, 2020 4:11 am

+1.

Many posts about this before, but I suppose it doesn't hurt to remind: still image handling needs improvement.
Windows 10 PC. Intel i7 x980, 24GB RAM, Nvidia 2070 Super 8GB GPU, SSD & RAID HD array. Dual UHD monitors. Decklink 4k mini. Resolve Studio 16.1.2
Offline

Mel Matsuoka

  • Posts: 424
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:54 am
  • Location: Honolulu, HI

Re: Better still image vs image sequence handling

PostSun Jan 26, 2020 10:44 pm

There is a lengthy thread examining this issue here:

https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/view ... 32&t=97680




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Resolve Studio 16.1.1.005 / Decklink 4K Extreme (11.4.1) / MacPro5,1 (macOS 10.13.6, 3.46 Ghz 12-core) / 96GB RAM / Boot: 500GB SSD / GUI: GTX 780 (6GB) / COMPUTE: GTX 1080ti SC (11GB), in Cyclone 2707 PCIe chassis / ATTO NT11 10Gb / SNS EVO NAS (10GbE)
Offline

wolfgang hershey

  • Posts: 140
  • Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 12:41 am
  • Location: chinatowns everywhere

Re: Better still image vs image sequence handling

PostMon Jan 27, 2020 3:36 pm

yes please please

don't rewrite names of incoming stills

please allow a project wide default setting for import images _as stills_ or as _image sequence_

thanks
WH
imac/hackintosh 14,2 (4-core 4.0 GHz i7) - 32GB - 980Ti
OS X 10.13.6 / 15.3 Resolve Studio - DeckLink Studio 4k
10Gb ethernet network
Offline

MLanghausen

  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 4:26 pm
  • Real Name: Michael Langhausen

Re: Better still image vs image sequence handling

PostWed Jan 29, 2020 2:33 am

Better still image handling in general...

The only camera RAW files supported without the need to convert to DNG are Canon Cameras.
There are a handful of Nikon RAW files that work natively and maybe one or two Sony Cameras who's RAW format came into Resolve natively and that was about it when I tested over a year ago.
ASUS Prime X299 - Deluxe
Intel Core i9 7980XE
80 GB DDR4 RAM
NVIDIA 1080ti
Intensity Pro 4k
Window 10

Return to DaVinci Resolve Feature Requests

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests