Wed Apr 26, 2017 7:39 pm
Quite simply cost & flexibility in the system. If you build an IP network correctly you can have redundancy that's seamless. If you build a network on IP you don't need routers, you can output audio & video directly onto the network.
A Broadcast project I'm building currently I've gone fully IP on video & audio. The cost saving on the video side in terms of cable & equipment infrastructure is $30K and a 12 day build down to a day, Audio is $35K and 24day build down to 2 days. In pure numbers i can build 12 Studios for the cost of 4 using the old methods. The IP video network cost $5K less on the physical kit cost but I save around $15K in infrastructure & $10K in Installer Man hours.
So for example all my IP PTZ cameras on the old consultant designed system needed 3 connections now on fully IP system its 1 Cat5e (yes you can run Cat6 but look at the cost of it) that does Command and control and Video. Saving in my facility around $500 per camera connection and 29W of power saving
Old system 40x40 router, Single point MultiView, DTR 3 Decks, Audio Level box for Switching 3 x 1ME switches, 7 Graphics PC's, 30 Converters 6.2kw of energy
All that is now running in a 2U box that has 8 M/E, 44 IP route points, 4 DDR's, 50 virtual still servers, Networked Digital audio & can run most of the inputs to it from Virtual Video Devices, Multiviewer and Control from anywhere in the world ( provided enough bandwidth) total power 400W
When you get into the command and control its so much easier to do what you want
The power & flexibility on the audio side is even more impressive but i'll just stick to the video
One bit of advice do not cut corners on the Network switches / infrastructure