- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:08 pm
This here is a MV screen I saw in a huge french production truck near the REC/VTR section, where operators used this to monitor and route ISO cameras. Sadly forgot to ask what the hardware behind this was.
I rearranged a bit the tiles, in the original pix the 10 camera souces were aligned on the upper half while the 4 remaining screens were grouped on the lower left while the PVW/PGM duo and the clock insert took the lower right.
This is the path I would like to see BMD taking in future ATEM hardware/software solutions.
10 screens for the 10 inputs ( but still flexibly routable ), 4 screens for non-camera related sources, like Mediaplayers and Playout feeds.
The trick with this precise arrangement here is the format of the single tiles/screens. They are closer to the 4:3 ratio and place the IDs in the the space outside of the 16:9 area. No pollution of the already scarce picture area. Hence this overall arrangement made possible.
The filling of the remaining empty space with a clock/countdown insert has already been seen in many other professional setups. Nothing new here. Still makes sense !
If only the next generation of BMD switcher could take over this kind of smart arrangement. With the evolution of the present hardware family, the validity of the Multiview arrangement has never been questioned, not a single inch was ever changed since the beginning of the ATEM line.
It's time to step over this old corpse and go looking for the next level, for whatever the number of M/E busses might become the "new" standard.
Grant Petty, this could/should be your next challenge. Let the old MV display die already.
- MultiView14 reshuffled sml.jpg (211.12 KiB) Viewed 1707 times
I rearranged a bit the tiles, in the original pix the 10 camera souces were aligned on the upper half while the 4 remaining screens were grouped on the lower left while the PVW/PGM duo and the clock insert took the lower right.
This is the path I would like to see BMD taking in future ATEM hardware/software solutions.
10 screens for the 10 inputs ( but still flexibly routable ), 4 screens for non-camera related sources, like Mediaplayers and Playout feeds.
The trick with this precise arrangement here is the format of the single tiles/screens. They are closer to the 4:3 ratio and place the IDs in the the space outside of the 16:9 area. No pollution of the already scarce picture area. Hence this overall arrangement made possible.
The filling of the remaining empty space with a clock/countdown insert has already been seen in many other professional setups. Nothing new here. Still makes sense !
If only the next generation of BMD switcher could take over this kind of smart arrangement. With the evolution of the present hardware family, the validity of the Multiview arrangement has never been questioned, not a single inch was ever changed since the beginning of the ATEM line.
It's time to step over this old corpse and go looking for the next level, for whatever the number of M/E busses might become the "new" standard.
Grant Petty, this could/should be your next challenge. Let the old MV display die already.
1M/E Prod Studio 4K
2M/E Prod Studio 4K
Television Studio HD
Studio Converter
4 Camera Converter
Teranex 2D
Ultrastudio 4K
UltraStudio Express
2M/E Prod Studio 4K
Television Studio HD
Studio Converter
4 Camera Converter
Teranex 2D
Ultrastudio 4K
UltraStudio Express