this device is based one a h.264 baseline profile encoder with, with very low transmission output-power, no DFS. it has no uncompressed or lossless codec inside. i do not see any CE of FCC signs in the pictures.
anyway, that is not what i want to develop
it is right that i will note make the FPGA or DSP by myself, we will license and buy a lot of CHIPS and include them in our solution.
right now, we are testing texas instruments (even the new beta h.265 HEVC reference)., silicon image and the new one from NTT video solutions. we are very talent video codec developers, with references in our software company from very known broadcast companies around the globe. these companies trust our video software products since 2004. As a CTO of this video software company, called Onlinelib / web:
http://onlinelib.de, i hope that people will like the new hardware products that we at rebotnix create for professional clients. we are able to react on customers needs much faster then every major company that license only reference hardware boards where they simply put they logo on and where they dont have access to the firmware or other components.
we also have the know how to program every ARM cortex CPU, very x86 in 32 and 64bit architectur CPU as well every DSP and FPGA from every manufacture on nearly every OS like lnx, osx or windows.
the reason why i want to support also the BM products is that i tested the h.264 recorder as well the ATEM studio to see how the internal h2.64 codec is performing. the h.264 devices from BM are working with some little tweaks in bitrates >30Mbit/sec., amazing! latency is too high for live point2point transmssion, but we can put these h2.64 BM devices from our uncompressed pipelines to compressed pipes to get Apple HLS Streaming, RTMP streaming as well for multicasting over UDP or to many clients in a production set. assuming if the clients want to have this features. on the other side i have some nice friends which are using the BMC where they need an nice integratable wireless solution.
we are new in the hardware market, right. that´s why i´m asking and looking for users and contacts in this forum thread to understand the needs that makes sense to create new products with great features.
update from the developing side:
what we have done today is to make some small 21dbi antennas in 16x16cm size to see if we can break the 200 meter range. cable has to be very very short to not loose signal strength, that why we make some plates for mounting the receiver. we are ready for outdoor testing now.
here is a snapshot from the receiver demo unit that we testing right now:
this solution will rock when it will come out and we try everything to make it under $4000
have a nice evening.
gary
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:20 pm
