Teranex Multiview 4 screen order

I'm curious, trying to understand how in Oz, when confronted with a display of 4 sources, a developer does decide that the "reading order" should first be [1] on the left of [3] and then on the lower row [2] and [4].

For an otherwise normal brain, it's always [1] [2] then [3] and [4]

Can't be the "Down Under" effect, or even driving on the "wrong" side of the road

On other BMD products, there is no such pain for the eyes.

So why not letting us have things the way they should be ( and for those who might say that there is no "us" vs "them", have some consideration for those who think otherwise ) and enabling the "right order" in the setup app.

Does this makes sense for some people ?

Not that the Multiview 4 is an example of sheer flexibility, seeing how rigid the Tally handling is executed.

This. All this. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE. Set the window order to [1] [2] over [3] [4]. At least in this configuration, I can work with the tallies being locked to the window numbers. BUT, even better would be to enable me to set which tally corresponds to which window. Make it a nice simple set of dropdowns - Window 1: Tally 1-20 Window 2: Tally 1-20... etc. You get the idea. Take it a step further, expose the tally on/off over the ethernet link. Let me control that with text commands, I can make that work.

PLEASE.

It follows the same pattern as the Multiview 16 for consistency. Unfortunately it doesn't have source routing like the 16, which would solve your problem.