2.35 ratio Render

Get answers to your questions about color grading, editing and finishing with DaVinci Resolve.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

Jason Chen

  • Posts: 46
  • Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 5:14 pm

2.35 ratio Render

PostFri Apr 28, 2017 9:05 am

I have a made a video edit in a 1920x1080 timeline in DaVinci Resolve. I tried applying output blanking 2.35 and render the video. It came out fine but has the black bars on top and bottom. How do I render it out without the black bars on the top and bottom. I tried changing the project settings to 1920x818 but it didn't work. Any help would be appreciated.
Offline

Jim Simon

  • Posts: 30205
  • Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:47 am

Re: 2.35 ratio Render

PostFri Apr 28, 2017 3:40 pm

If you want to export without the black bars, create and edit in a timeline matching the desired resolution.

I often use 1920 x 800 myself.
My Biases:

You NEED training.
You NEED a desktop.
You NEED a calibrated (non-computer) display.
Offline

John Paines

  • Posts: 5820
  • Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 4:04 pm

Re: 2.35 ratio Render

PostFri Apr 28, 2017 4:02 pm

Jim Simon wrote:If you want to export without the black bars, create and edit in a timeline matching the desired resolution.

I often use 1920 x 800 myself.


And you actually succeeded, doing that? What codec?
Offline

Kays Alatrakchi

  • Posts: 1291
  • Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:22 am
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: 2.35 ratio Render

PostFri Apr 28, 2017 4:13 pm

Quicktime, mp4, m4v, mkv will support whichever resolution ratio is chosen. Most players (i.e. Smart TV's and of course computers) will play them back and pillarbox or letterbox as needed.

Having said that, nowadays most broadcasters and other industry distributors specifically request a 16X9 file even if it does include pillarbox or letterbox blanking as part of the video.
>>Kays Alatrakchi
Filmmaker based in Los Angeles, CA
http://moviesbykays.com

Resolve 18.1.4, Mac OS X 12.6.3 (Monterey), iMac Pro 64Gb RAM, Decklink Mini 4K, LG C9

Mac Book Air M1, Mac OS X 12.6 (Monterey), 16Gb RAM
Offline

John Paines

  • Posts: 5820
  • Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 4:04 pm

Re: 2.35 ratio Render

PostFri Apr 28, 2017 4:14 pm

Again, did you actually try it and succeed? I think you'll end up with a 1920x1080 container no matter what the Resolve settings are. And, worse, actual picture dimensions can end up reduced.
Offline

Luca Di Gioacchino

  • Posts: 160
  • Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:23 pm
  • Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: 2.35 ratio Render

PostFri Apr 28, 2017 4:21 pm

I've done it and succeeded. Created a 1920 x 815 timeline, exported, and got a file of the same resolution.
Offline

John Paines

  • Posts: 5820
  • Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 4:04 pm

Re: 2.35 ratio Render

PostFri Apr 28, 2017 4:26 pm

What was the native footage resolution? The timeline resolution? The deliver resolution? The delivery codec? Thanks.
Offline
User avatar

Jean Claude

  • Posts: 2973
  • Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 4:41 pm
  • Location: France

Re: 2.35 ratio Render

PostFri Apr 28, 2017 4:29 pm

Luca Di Gioacchino wrote:I've done it and succeeded. Created a 1920 x 815 timeline, exported, and got a file of the same resolution.


I think of an error of typo 815 ...
In general, codecs accept modulo 8 or modulo 16 = 0

With which codec the 815?
"Saying it is good, but doing it is better! "
Win10-1809 | Resolve Studio V16.1 | Fusion Studio V16.1 | Decklink 4K Extreme 6G | RTX 2080Ti 431.86 NSD driver! |
Offline

Truls Aagedal

  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:04 pm

Re: 2.35 ratio Render

PostFri Apr 28, 2017 8:23 pm

Jean Claude wrote:I think of an error of typo 815 ...
In general, codecs accept modulo 8 or modulo 16 = 0




AFAIK modulus 8 and 16 isn't really a problem with newer devices/versions of h264, but was a bigger issue a few years ago, when h.264 was new. (?)
But to be safe I always try to keep the pixel count even.
Offline

Lee Gauthier

  • Posts: 941
  • Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 10:51 pm

Re: 2.35 ratio Render

PostFri Apr 28, 2017 10:35 pm

Jason Chen wrote:I tried applying output blanking 2.35 and render the video.


Unless you're going for a pre-1970 vibe, you should be working with 2.39:1 aspect. 2.35:1 was deprecated by SMPTE in 1970 in favor of 2.39:1 for widescreen. All cinema, streaming and shiny discs conform to 2.39:1 (Some used 2.40 to make the math easier.)

That translates into 1920 x 800 or 1920 x 804.
Offline

Jim Simon

  • Posts: 30205
  • Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:47 am

Re: 2.35 ratio Render

PostSat Apr 29, 2017 4:26 pm

John Paines wrote:And you actually succeeded, doing that? What codec?


Cineform.
My Biases:

You NEED training.
You NEED a desktop.
You NEED a calibrated (non-computer) display.
Offline
User avatar

Marc Wielage

  • Posts: 11017
  • Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:46 am
  • Location: Hollywood, USA

Re: 2.35 ratio Render

PostSat Apr 29, 2017 11:07 pm

Be sure to turn off letterbox blanking prior to the render. And use Brad Allen's excellent "Aspect Ratio Cheat Sheet" as a guide:

unravel.com.au/files/Unravel_Resolution_CheatSheet.pdf
marc wielage, csi • VP/color & workflow • chroma | hollywood

Return to DaVinci Resolve

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 190 guests