Wed Jun 14, 2017 4:25 pm
I agree (I have a similar background), and the manuals could be organized better and have more complete details. Reading through the ones I have, i can see they were written for experienced users, giving them the needed info in equipment specific features, and settings.
However, they are often incomplete I. Some areas, and without any experience, a new user reading these gets tough. Even with experience, sorting out some of the features or settings is not always straightforward for me either.
They look like they were written by an engineer who understands the gear, and leaves out what might be obvious details, he understands, and assumes we will too. I have done some tech writing and documentation, this is not always easy, especially if you are very familiar with the equipment, it is easy to miss details that a new user will really need.
Also, organization of the one-for-all manuals could be improved, with into on each camera and its features reviewed, then general info that is the same for all models, then break out the individual units by chapter, covering unit specific details. I think this would make the manuals quicker to use, especially for reference to using less used features.
Barry Green did a nice job of this with the AF100 manual he wrote, because the Panasonic "manual" was very cryptic and lacked details for a new user. Perhaps, this opens the door for a similar, "user" written operational manual similar to Barry's AF100 manual, which is a nice introduction to cinematography basics as well as camera specific settings, in addition to general camera operations, and some best practices suggestions. Given the Ursa Mini is being marketed to the same audience as the AF100 was marketed at.
Cheers
Cheers
Denny Smith
SHA Productions