rick.lang wrote:Chad, I’ll get back to you tomorrow.
Sorry, Chad. Looks like I didn’t keep the comparison on Vimeo. Echoing an earlier comment, I remember seeing differences among all flavours of raw in the identical scene shooting a very complex subject. For most scenes, likely 3:1 will be completely acceptable.
I’ve shot 4:1 when I needed the longer recording times and it’s good, but I generally avoid it if I have the option to shoot 3:1. Of course if you need the very best results, go with raw, however I believe John Brawley has said he shoots raw 3:1 usually when he isn’t shooting ProRes 444.
To estimate space requirements, compressed raw for me is 1.3x due to complexity of the frame; raw 3:1 is about half the compressed raw (or a third uncompressed) and 4:1 is a third the compressed raw or a quarter uncompressed raw.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk