John Brawley wrote:There's no point engaging with his irrelevant posts that contribute zero to the craft of cinematography and are usually grandstanding about his own capabilities, interspersed with his hurt feelings about being called out. I think he just desperately wants to be part of the conversation.
John, you admitted to following me around last time. These people are stalking and trolling me and Lee. I am not having wishful thinking, if there is a way, there is a way, if not, then not, this is what I have always said and the only safe opinion to have to explore truth. Some maybe a bit overly positive about it, but that doesn't validate the tirade of irrational negativity launched against them. They contribute little but provoking negativity trying to repeatedly blow things up in order to get their will over Lee, rather than leave Lee etc to it, apologise and go away. Look I left the Elphel and Axiom camera bunch too it, because they were heading down a wrong path, and look how they went. Maybe they will get their less than $10k 4k camera out one day, meanwhile people are using a $1.295k Pocket 4k. So many things wrong there. But you don't see me rudely going on in their forums like these people here. This us the truth, and I leave them to it. Once they have the reasoning then it's up to them. The people in these threads are showing a lot of psychological issues, and even transference where they accuse others of doing or being what they themselves are, transferring their feelings, and then irrationally accusing the other person who isn't doing it. The accusation of irrational emotive people as they are rational and the others who are rational, must be the irrational ones. It's very demonic.
They also are missing elephants as to why this is likely not going get done. One, nobody is volunteering to do it (I have my own stuff on, as I answered before, and it's not something I see as beneficial past Pocket owners and their customers) and two some things said are technically a bit optimistic and unproven, which is getting glanced over in all the laser focused harassment.
Now, you are mistaken about me. My focus is on what us more correct, and yes it's a reputation benefiting position to have. But I'd rather suffer bad reputation then support incorrect things. For me, the truth is more important. Now, yes I have done and seen more than most, and climbed a mountain. So, I don't have nothing to think and slinging mud up hill doesn't help.
But don't you think, these posts against me, and Lee to some extent, are just grandstanding? The ones that want to grandstand, and they initiate a lot of posts trying to put us under, think it must be about grandstanding and transfer their emotion, when it was about truth first.
Now, your comments to Lee, I'm happy are reasonable. Except, yes, prores doesn't need to be changed in order to do a lot of things which don't require FPGA redesign. The power to them.
If you read the threads, nobody has actually offered any technical proof against, let alone proof of great efforts, only some little disassembly posts which doesn't prove. Often only opinionated grandstanding rants over Lee, and anybody that defends him (telling). They have been on him for a while, poor fellow.
Your opinion about their engineers opinion is noted, but I have been trying to find the video where they describe why it isn't possible in order to ascertain if their is a way around the issues. Look, and this purely is somebody again trying to reason, but if you stand on a mountain you are already up there. Engineers have opinions, often getting into simplicity. When I went to uni with one of the better engineers in the country, who is invited to present at conferences abroad, I called out a few of his simplistic opinions. It's amazing what they think is right, just as a rationalised presumption, rather than something actually rational, and it turns out wrong. You watch them and they can't get it, because their minds have rationalised to the faulty presumption, which stops them from further deeper thinking. Now, he is familiar with me, and volunteers I am the smartest person he knows, and that includes a lot of top people. I get compliments from other engineers too. So, yes, I would like to verify your opinion of the engineers opinion, because opinion handed around and down doesn't necessarily mean it's final. With all the stuff I have seen and done, opinion doesn't usually cut it anymore. I am not 20.
You will notice, I don't demand that 50fps is possible or impossible like people around here. Again, as I said, I just say it has to be examined to determine if there is a way around it (if at all), the only safe rational opinion to have.
@All
But can point out something some of these people are doing, which might escape others attention. The game they are playing is to provoke the other person into defending themselves repeatedly, thinking that the more they get the person defending themselves to write the better they themselves look and feel, and the worse the other person looks, in response to their own agency of control. But in reality when a rational person reads it, they see rationally written responses to irrational deceptive attacks (and some revelation on the attackers motives), and the attackers dig a hole for themselves.
The only way to read what I write, is rationally. If read emotionally, say in pecking order, or very biased viewpoint, it will appear irrational to them.
Do you want to stand with such?
Now respect I give plenty of, but it is something to be earned after lost.
Is you guys repeatedly coming in here and trolling the subject.
Australian Image wrote:Given this never-ending diatribe against everything to do with Blackmagic, I fail to understand how anyone could continue to think that Blackmagic would have one iota of interest in providing said people with any form of support for their wishful thinking.
I'm beginning to wonder whether this is all just trolling in an attempt to make Blackmagic look bad, given that the discussion has now veered into bagging the BMPCC4k as well. These carpetbaggers seem to have no real interest in producing video whatsoever; they would be comfortably at home in the DPReview forums where this crap is bread and butter to all too many.
That is trolling and you guys have been doing the carpet bagging.
If nobody stirs the tea, the leaves will settle. But you guys have had too many spoons in the cup. The threads would have gone quiet without all the "carpet bagging".
Jamie LeJeune wrote:The best we can do is to just totally ignore the trolls. Replying to their nonsense only feeds them.
Jamie, that sounds like Trolling.
Jamie LeJeune wrote:It's always so good to read your wise and informative posts on the forum JB.
Trolling again?