- Posts: 347
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 5:55 pm
I know most people will disagree. But I would still try to logically build up my case. We need a version for editors and editors only.
DR has come a long way from what it was in DR 10 (from the time I had been using DR) to now. And it is now a great editing tool also. With the second monitor now available, it can be used a full-fledged editing system. So why not bifurcate and also make it a proper editing software?
Well, I mean the editors do not need to correct colours. They are also not interested to mix 5.1 sound. They know certain things are best left to graphics artists or the sound designers. They want to edit, need a few plugins for transitions, well a few more tricks like FX, managing the media and giving xml's. Resolve has them all. But the editors are scared to run Resolve because it has too many functions (tabs), which they don't need. And also, they can't edit with their normal laptop or an old Desktop, because DR needs high-powered machines. And that's the reason they stick to FCP, Premiere and Avid. They are scared with DR.
Why not make something for the Editors and only the editors? They don't need full resolution files, they need proxies. That can run on low-speced machines. They just need good media management (which DR already has), a few sound management tools, FX library and may be three colour wheels. That's about all.
DR can actually become the market leader in Edit software.
I second the proposal that was made in this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=96573
But I wouldn't call it for Prosumers. I would say this is needed for professional editors. For editors, don't mix up things please.
Now, go ahead and rip me apart.
DR has come a long way from what it was in DR 10 (from the time I had been using DR) to now. And it is now a great editing tool also. With the second monitor now available, it can be used a full-fledged editing system. So why not bifurcate and also make it a proper editing software?
Well, I mean the editors do not need to correct colours. They are also not interested to mix 5.1 sound. They know certain things are best left to graphics artists or the sound designers. They want to edit, need a few plugins for transitions, well a few more tricks like FX, managing the media and giving xml's. Resolve has them all. But the editors are scared to run Resolve because it has too many functions (tabs), which they don't need. And also, they can't edit with their normal laptop or an old Desktop, because DR needs high-powered machines. And that's the reason they stick to FCP, Premiere and Avid. They are scared with DR.
Why not make something for the Editors and only the editors? They don't need full resolution files, they need proxies. That can run on low-speced machines. They just need good media management (which DR already has), a few sound management tools, FX library and may be three colour wheels. That's about all.
DR can actually become the market leader in Edit software.
I second the proposal that was made in this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=96573
But I wouldn't call it for Prosumers. I would say this is needed for professional editors. For editors, don't mix up things please.
Now, go ahead and rip me apart.
FILMWALLAH.
DR Studio. Mac M1 Studio Ultra 64 GB Ram, T7 for Resolve Cache
UMP G2, BMD Pocket 6K, Canon R5 C
Zeiss CP.3 15, 25, 50, 85. Zeiss Contax 25, 35, 50, 85, 135.
DR Studio. Mac M1 Studio Ultra 64 GB Ram, T7 for Resolve Cache
UMP G2, BMD Pocket 6K, Canon R5 C
Zeiss CP.3 15, 25, 50, 85. Zeiss Contax 25, 35, 50, 85, 135.