ot - adobe's new terms are a worry...

now this is an interesting move indeed:

there are so many unanswered questions raised that i have no idea where to start, other than having a / any subscription service having access to your files for whatever purpose looks like a very slippery road to what's yours is mine, and what's mine is mine!

https://petapixel.com/2024/06/06/photographers-outraged-by-adobes-new-privacy-and-content-terms/

https://readwrite.com/adobe-causes-user-outrage-with-a-change-in-photoshop-tocs-that-lets-it-access-all-your-content/

thoughts?

I have moved to GIMP while ago. Last beta version came with several improvements but not expect AI and pro stuff. But i have downgraded myself to prosumer lately so works for me.

https://www.gimp.org/news/2024/02/21/gi ... -released/

So freaking overblown. Although Corporate Adobe generates these situations with their affinity for dense verbiage when trying to be "clear and transparent" .

Over and over.

Read their clarification. They neither have the interest nor have the capacity to steal your images or violate your NDAs.

https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/ ... utAXNtT35W

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

Adobe roofies all of their customers

It's bad enough that they take your own work as hostage for subscription.