Are Analog to SDI distance limits input dependent?
Hi folks,
We've got a weird "intermediate" setup as we've upgraded our church video backbone to an ATEM 1 M/E, but still have Canon GL-1 analog cameras. Until we can afford to upgrade the cameras, we use Analog to SDI converters at the camera locations to convert from S-video to SD/SDI. Then we run that over in-wall RG-6 to the video booth (lengths of 50-100', max). There they're converted from 480i to 720p with UpDownCross converters before ending up at the ATEM 1 M/E inputs.
Although the in-wall cabling we have is aluminum RG-6 (don't ask, long story), we do plan to upgrade eventually to fiber after upgrading the cameras, so we tested it for now to see if it would work with SDI (following the "digital either works or it doesn't" idea). Well, it does work for all but the farthest camera, which is probably around the 80-100' mark, but it was kinda weird: it worked on the Composite input setting, but not on the S-Video setting.
So I'm wondering, since allowable distance over SDI is inversely proportional to the resolution carried, and resolution really translates to amount of information carried, is the issue I'm seeing the result of S-video carrying more information than composite? Both are NTSC, but composite is over a single cable, while S-video is over two (luminance and chrominance), so since S-video is two signals, is it actually more information carried and that's why it won't transmit as far as the composite signal in my setup?
Thanks,
Jeff
We've got a weird "intermediate" setup as we've upgraded our church video backbone to an ATEM 1 M/E, but still have Canon GL-1 analog cameras. Until we can afford to upgrade the cameras, we use Analog to SDI converters at the camera locations to convert from S-video to SD/SDI. Then we run that over in-wall RG-6 to the video booth (lengths of 50-100', max). There they're converted from 480i to 720p with UpDownCross converters before ending up at the ATEM 1 M/E inputs.
Although the in-wall cabling we have is aluminum RG-6 (don't ask, long story), we do plan to upgrade eventually to fiber after upgrading the cameras, so we tested it for now to see if it would work with SDI (following the "digital either works or it doesn't" idea). Well, it does work for all but the farthest camera, which is probably around the 80-100' mark, but it was kinda weird: it worked on the Composite input setting, but not on the S-Video setting.
So I'm wondering, since allowable distance over SDI is inversely proportional to the resolution carried, and resolution really translates to amount of information carried, is the issue I'm seeing the result of S-video carrying more information than composite? Both are NTSC, but composite is over a single cable, while S-video is over two (luminance and chrominance), so since S-video is two signals, is it actually more information carried and that's why it won't transmit as far as the composite signal in my setup?
Thanks,
Jeff