
Now that people are receiving the new URSA Cine 12K, I thought it might be worthwhile to have a topic dedicated to this camera. Currently we already have a few posts started in other threads that refer to the Cine 12K and other cameras, but going forward, perhaps we could post relevant materials that are focused on the Cine 12K in its own topic.
To begin this discussion, I’d like to comment on the cost of the camera beginning at just under $15,000 USD. At first glance this cost seems high when it’s compared to the URSA Mini 12K camera. As I learn more about the Cine 12K camera, it does seem to be a new beginning for BMD to attract higher-end productions with several enhanced features. And the cost seems very reasonable.
Although BMD hasn’t explicitly commented on the future of the URSA Mini 12K, the Cine 12K looks like it will be a real contender for productions that would otherwise only consider cameras that require an investment up to 10x this price. Let’s say its competitors are several times the cost rather than 10x the cost. That price difference may mean greater penetration growing the market that’s below the top tier (where camera costs are almost irrelevant it seems). Both the rental market and the owner market may appreciate cost savings using the Cine 12K given its features.
As for the factor that has impeded the adoption of BMD cameras in more productions, I haven’t seen any comment about reliability and direct BMD support to productions. The one year warranty may cause adoption to be sluggish, but we all know if that’s a serious concern for a production, they could simply rent two cameras and still save significant money. Still I suspect a three year warranty would have a larger appeal to anyone hesitant due to the perceived risks. Over time, the camera may prove to have much better reliability and this issue will go away, but that’s not true today.
Overall I think the Cine 12K deserves to put BMD on the map and is a terrific achievement.
To begin this discussion, I’d like to comment on the cost of the camera beginning at just under $15,000 USD. At first glance this cost seems high when it’s compared to the URSA Mini 12K camera. As I learn more about the Cine 12K camera, it does seem to be a new beginning for BMD to attract higher-end productions with several enhanced features. And the cost seems very reasonable.
Although BMD hasn’t explicitly commented on the future of the URSA Mini 12K, the Cine 12K looks like it will be a real contender for productions that would otherwise only consider cameras that require an investment up to 10x this price. Let’s say its competitors are several times the cost rather than 10x the cost. That price difference may mean greater penetration growing the market that’s below the top tier (where camera costs are almost irrelevant it seems). Both the rental market and the owner market may appreciate cost savings using the Cine 12K given its features.
As for the factor that has impeded the adoption of BMD cameras in more productions, I haven’t seen any comment about reliability and direct BMD support to productions. The one year warranty may cause adoption to be sluggish, but we all know if that’s a serious concern for a production, they could simply rent two cameras and still save significant money. Still I suspect a three year warranty would have a larger appeal to anyone hesitant due to the perceived risks. Over time, the camera may prove to have much better reliability and this issue will go away, but that’s not true today.
Overall I think the Cine 12K deserves to put BMD on the map and is a terrific achievement.
Rick Lang