rick.lang wrote:I quoted your words exactly. Now you’re using examples that do support your contention well but have nothing to do with dumb editing and grading.
I meant it as dumb tasks + editing and grading. Not that editing and grading are dumb tasks.
Also you left out the important middle text that transitioned to my point. So you did not quote my words exactly.
"This will impower people. Automate the dumb tasks so there is more time for creativity. Automate grading, editing etc.
Honestly there's plenty of video production that should be replaced by AI. I don't care if the ads i see on TV are made from scratch or just AI generated, they're all drivel these days.
Think about how incredible it is, that you can just record something on your phone, then tell an AI to show it as if it was done with proper lighting, steady camera holding etc.
Working with social media and especially podcasts or long form interviews, they really want to have a program that can just edit that for them, grab highlights etc. It's pretty menial work.
I see AI, when integrated in detail or into specific steps in a workflow, to be something that free's up time to focus on creativity (or the parts of creativity that requires hands-on work).
That's the purpose of every tool right now, AI just takes it further
