Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

The place for questions about shooting with Blackmagic Cameras.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

Note Suwanchote

  • Posts: 298
  • Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:51 pm

Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostSat Aug 01, 2020 7:02 am

Here are some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K. Shots with people in them coming at a later time.
I'm extremely impressed with the details and colors that you can get from this camera.
I think the team at BMD has achieved something really special.

I found the dynamic range to be incredible. The flexibility of the files is something that stands out when you start grading. The 14 stops is a bit conservative from my impressions.

Shot with the Sigma 18-35mm.

ImageUrsa Mini Pro 12K by Note S., on Flickr

ImageUrsa Mini Pro 12K by Note S., on Flickr

ImageUrsa Mini Pro 12K 2x Anamorphic by Note S., on Flickr

2x Anamorphic on Nikon 85mm 1.8 non-ai with Isco Ultra Star Red
Last edited by Note Suwanchote on Sun Aug 02, 2020 9:41 pm, edited 6 times in total.
lightformfilm.com
vimeo.com/Suwanchote
Offline

jack0429

  • Posts: 112
  • Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:55 am
  • Real Name: Jack Jin

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostSat Aug 01, 2020 7:51 am

Will there be any original 12k stills uploaded?
Offline

jallen0

  • Posts: 123
  • Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 7:04 pm
  • Real Name: Justin Allen

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostSat Aug 01, 2020 11:44 am

I saw your post on Facebook. I think the image is impressive in that you used the Sigma 18-35 lens on an EF mount for these shots. Looking forward to seeing more!
Offline

Brad Hurley

  • Posts: 1593
  • Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 7:42 pm
  • Location: Montréal

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostSat Aug 01, 2020 12:48 pm

jallen0 wrote:I saw your post on Facebook. I think the image is impressive in that you used the Sigma 18-35 lens on an EF mount for these shots. Looking forward to seeing more!


My most-disliked lens, but you (and the Ursa 12K) made it do beautiful things.
Resolve 16.1.2 Studio, Mac Pro 3.0 GHz 8-core, 32 gigs RAM, dual AMD D700 GPU.
Audio I/O: Sound Devices USBPre-2
Offline
User avatar

Adam Langdon

  • Posts: 381
  • Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:15 pm
  • Location: Ohio USA

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostSat Aug 01, 2020 2:29 pm

Looks incredibly 3D!
Can’t wait to see some motion.
Ursa Mini Pro - Vintage Russian Glass - Contax Zeiss Set - Tamron 24-70mm f2.8
Offline
User avatar

Note Suwanchote

  • Posts: 298
  • Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:51 pm

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostSat Aug 01, 2020 5:38 pm

Brad Hurley wrote:
jallen0 wrote:I saw your post on Facebook. I think the image is impressive in that you used the Sigma 18-35 lens on an EF mount for these shots. Looking forward to seeing more!


My most-disliked lens, but you (and the Ursa 12K) made it do beautiful things.


Much appreciated. I was surprised at how this lens interacted with the Ursa Mini Pro 12K.

Adam Langdon wrote:Looks incredibly 3D! Can’t wait to see some motion.

Thanks Adam! I agree.

jack0429 wrote:Will there be any original 12k stills uploaded?

Possibly in the future!
lightformfilm.com
vimeo.com/Suwanchote
Offline
User avatar

timbutt2

  • Posts: 1593
  • Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 10:32 am

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostSat Aug 01, 2020 7:09 pm

Saw and commented on the Facebook, but wanted to again praise the images! Although my first plan is to upgrade my EF glass to PL glass so that I can just rent PL glass from here on out without need to change the mount, I'm very impressed with the fact that this is the 18-35 Sigma EF. I have that lens, so I know that it holds up on the 12K now.

I'd love to see more and especially in motion. I'd be very interested to see moving imagery with some really nice lenses like the Cookes. I have a local studio that has them. Would love to see how well the 12K resolves gorgeous Cooke glass.
"I'm well trained in the art of turning **** to gold." - Tim Buttner (timbutt2)

Cameras: URSA Mini Pro G2, URSA Mini 4.6K EF & Cinema Camera 2.5K EF
Computers: iMac 5K (Late 2015) & MacBook Pro Retina 15.4in (Mid 2018)
Offline
User avatar

Note Suwanchote

  • Posts: 298
  • Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:51 pm

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostSun Aug 02, 2020 3:11 am

timbutt2 wrote:Saw and commented on the Facebook, but wanted to again praise the images! Although my first plan is to upgrade my EF glass to PL glass so that I can just rent PL glass from here on out without need to change the mount, I'm very impressed with the fact that this is the 18-35 Sigma EF. I have that lens, so I know that it holds up on the 12K now.

I'd love to see more and especially in motion. I'd be very interested to see moving imagery with some really nice lenses like the Cookes. I have a local studio that has them. Would love to see how well the 12K resolves gorgeous Cooke glass.


I'm surprised at how well the Sigma holds up. I have some shots in anamorphic with a Milvus that I may put up soon.

Yeah the motion on this camera is amazing. It's something people don't talk about but in 8K it's RSI times are incredible.
lightformfilm.com
vimeo.com/Suwanchote
Offline

Ryan Earl

  • Posts: 210
  • Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:56 pm
  • Location: Philadelphia, USA

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostSun Aug 02, 2020 12:23 pm

Great images Note, looking forward to more.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Offline
User avatar

Adam Langdon

  • Posts: 381
  • Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:15 pm
  • Location: Ohio USA

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostSun Aug 02, 2020 6:51 pm

Note, please post some anamorphic stills! Can’t wait to try that out.
Ursa Mini Pro - Vintage Russian Glass - Contax Zeiss Set - Tamron 24-70mm f2.8
Offline
User avatar

Note Suwanchote

  • Posts: 298
  • Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:51 pm

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostSun Aug 02, 2020 9:38 pm

Adam Langdon wrote:Note, please post some anamorphic stills! Can’t wait to try that out.


updated with anamorphic
lightformfilm.com
vimeo.com/Suwanchote
Offline
User avatar

Adam Langdon

  • Posts: 381
  • Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:15 pm
  • Location: Ohio USA

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostSun Aug 02, 2020 10:45 pm

Just beautiful. Thanks!
s35 really is the perfect sensor size, IMO.
Ursa Mini Pro - Vintage Russian Glass - Contax Zeiss Set - Tamron 24-70mm f2.8
Offline

jallen0

  • Posts: 123
  • Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 7:04 pm
  • Real Name: Justin Allen

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostSun Aug 02, 2020 11:49 pm

Looking forward to seeing some video when you are allowed. See how it all stays together.
Offline

visalapol

  • Posts: 32
  • Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 1:37 pm
  • Real Name: Visalapol Nutavej

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostMon Aug 03, 2020 7:56 am

Can URSA 12K take singel still image inside camera? What is the file type or you need to grab Still inside Davinci resolve?
Offline

Piotr Naumowicz

  • Posts: 59
  • Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:15 am

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostMon Aug 03, 2020 1:03 pm

Impressive. Most Impressive.
Looks like this camera will be something special. I love the tonality and colour. Even with a cheap lens, the image looks stunning.

This is a first camera in a while that makes my heart beat faster.

I would love to see those shots in motion.
Offline

Uli Plank

  • Posts: 7164
  • Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:48 am
  • Location: Germany and Indonesia

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostMon Aug 03, 2020 2:14 pm

While the pixel density on this camera is probably the maximum for S-35 where you can still see a difference between the best lenses and the second best, what's wrong with using older glass if it fits the look you're after?
See this article, which was already linked around here:
http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2017/10 ... d-sensors/

Oh, and the Sigma 18-35mm is pretty good glass, but It's so sad that the EF mount is not locking properly.
I hope someone will construct a better one for the UMP 12K.

You can always export a single frame under the Camera Raw tab in Resolve, but it'll be BRAW. Since you may want to grade it anyway, you can use the export possibilities in the Stills Gallery. But maybe one of the image processing softwares will get BRAW import? After all, the SDK is free.
Resolve Studio 16.2.2 and Fusion Studio under MacOS Mojave 10.14.6
iMac 2017 Radeon Pro 580 8 GB VRAM and 32 GB RAM
Mac mini 16 GB RAM plus eGFX Breakway Radeon RX 580
Offline

Chris Shivers

  • Posts: 327
  • Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2017 3:12 am

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostMon Aug 03, 2020 5:45 pm

Note Suwanchote wrote:I found the dynamic range to be incredible. The flexibility of the files is something that stands out when you start grading. The 14 stops is a bit conservative from my impressions.

So what you're saying is that it has better dynamic range than the ursa mini pro G2?
Offline

Oyvind Fiksdal

  • Posts: 354
  • Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostMon Aug 03, 2020 9:59 pm

Adam Langdon wrote:Looks incredibly 3D!
Can’t wait to see some motion.


I agree. The IQ is tight and it seem to have some unexplainable depth to it. It was the same with the 12k shot that JB did, where the woman is moving towards the chair beside the water. Its hard to put a finger on it, but there is a subliminal depth that reminds me of larger sensor cameras. Like Hasselblad or phase one. Interesting.
Offline

John Brawley

  • Posts: 2560
  • Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 7:57 am
  • Location: New Orleans, Louisiana

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostTue Aug 04, 2020 12:31 am

visalapol wrote:Can URSA 12K take singel still image inside camera? What is the file type or you need to grab Still inside Davinci resolve?


There’s a great feature in Resolve where you can export a single frame.

What’s strange is I’ve emailed screen shots of frame from resolve and the exported frame itself is smaller.

JB
John Brawley
Cinematographer
New Orleans Louisiana
Offline

Kholi Hicks

  • Posts: 723
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:23 pm

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostTue Aug 04, 2020 1:13 am

Oyvind Fiksdal wrote:
Adam Langdon wrote:Looks incredibly 3D!
Can’t wait to see some motion.


I agree. The IQ is tight and it seem to have some unexplainable depth to it. It was the same with the 12k shot that JB did, where the woman is moving towards the chair beside the water. Its hard to put a finger on it, but there is a subliminal depth that reminds me of larger sensor cameras. Like Hasselblad or phase one. Interesting.


I love this comment. During the first moments with the camera, that was the one thing that stood out to me. It has such a "large" look to it, no matter which glass you have on it (so far). Roman and I talk about this quite often—just about daily.

I would like to know what it is and how to define the "effect". Is it purely the 80MP sensor? Is it the 80MP sensor minus an OLPF? I wish there were a way to test those things but I'm sure someone will figure it out!

@Note — nice shootin'
Kholi Hicks
Offline
User avatar

Jamie LeJeune

  • Posts: 1258
  • Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:33 am
  • Location: San Francisco

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostTue Aug 04, 2020 2:23 am

John Brawley wrote:What’s strange is I’ve emailed screen shots of frame from resolve and the exported frame itself is smaller.

JB
Perhaps the still frames will only export at the size defined in the project and/or timeline?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
www.cinedocs.com
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4601572/
Offline
User avatar

PaulDelVecchio

  • Posts: 799
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:33 am
  • Location: NY

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostTue Aug 04, 2020 2:29 am

Jamie LeJeune wrote:
John Brawley wrote:What’s strange is I’ve emailed screen shots of frame from resolve and the exported frame itself is smaller.

JB
Perhaps the still frames will only export at the size defined in the project and/or timeline?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯


I've found this to be the case. You have to change the timeline settings to match.
Paul Del Vecchio - Director/Producer
http://www.pauldv.net
http://www.youtube.com/user/pdelvecchio814
http://www.facebook.com/pauldv
http://instagram.com/pdelv
Twitter: @pauldv
Offline

John Brawley

  • Posts: 2560
  • Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 7:57 am
  • Location: New Orleans, Louisiana

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostTue Aug 04, 2020 2:34 am

Jamie LeJeune wrote:
John Brawley wrote:What’s strange is I’ve emailed screen shots of frame from resolve and the exported frame itself is smaller.

JB
Perhaps the still frames will only export at the size defined in the project and/or timeline?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯



Finder screen shots.

Not timeline frame grabs.

jb
John Brawley
Cinematographer
New Orleans Louisiana
Offline
User avatar

Note Suwanchote

  • Posts: 298
  • Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:51 pm

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostTue Aug 04, 2020 3:23 am

Kholi Hicks wrote:
Oyvind Fiksdal wrote:
Adam Langdon wrote:Looks incredibly 3D!
Can’t wait to see some motion.


I agree. The IQ is tight and it seem to have some unexplainable depth to it. It was the same with the 12k shot that JB did, where the woman is moving towards the chair beside the water. Its hard to put a finger on it, but there is a subliminal depth that reminds me of larger sensor cameras. Like Hasselblad or phase one. Interesting.


I love this comment. During the first moments with the camera, that was the one thing that stood out to me. It has such a "large" look to it, no matter which glass you have on it (so far). Roman and I talk about this quite often—just about daily.

I would like to know what it is and how to define the "effect". Is it purely the 80MP sensor? Is it the 80MP sensor minus an OLPF? I wish there were a way to test those things but I'm sure someone will figure it out!

@Note — nice shootin'
Oyvind Fiksdal wrote:
Adam Langdon wrote:Looks incredibly 3D!
Can’t wait to see some motion.

I agree. The IQ is tight and it seem to have some unexplainable depth to it. It was the same with the 12k shot that JB did, where the woman is moving towards the chair beside the water. Its hard to put a finger on it, but there is a subliminal depth that reminds me of larger sensor cameras. Like Hasselblad or phase one. Interesting.


Yeah! This is what’s surprising to me. There’s a dimensionality to it and there’s a larger format feel. Something special here! I think this it translates very well in motion.

Chris Shivers wrote:
Note Suwanchote wrote:I found the dynamic range to be incredible. The flexibility of the files is something that stands out when you start grading. The 14 stops is a bit conservative from my impressions.


So what you're saying is that it has better dynamic range than the ursa mini pro G2?


It’s similar from my use. It “feels” easier to grade from my impressions so far. The color response is very fluid.

Piotr Naumowicz wrote:Impressive. Most Impressive.
Looks like this camera will be something special. I love the tonality and colour. Even with a cheap lens, the image looks stunning.

This is a first camera in a while that makes my heart beat faster.

I would love to see those shots in motion.


Ryan Earl wrote:Great images Note, looking forward to more.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thank you!
lightformfilm.com
vimeo.com/Suwanchote
Offline

Oyvind Fiksdal

  • Posts: 354
  • Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostTue Aug 04, 2020 7:40 am

Yes. I have always assumed that large look is mainly inherited because of larger sensor, but now I start questioning that…

Basically, we can emulate the scope of larger sensor by using other lenses recorded on smaller sensor. That’s not new, but the main effect seems to only simulate correct FOV and DOP without making it “larger” in that sense. That’s the notion.

Now in the celluloid days we didn’t relate to pixels… Naturally the large format film stocks did receive more information, because of its bigger surface to render the image. Let’s imagen for a minute that we could magically double the rendered information on a 35mm film stock. How would that look projected to the silver screen… Like 70mm? With digital sensors we can render more information on a tiny space as the technology evolves. That was not the case on celluloid since we stopped developing it.

The design of the sensor, how the pixels are arranged and translate the light, should also be mentioned here. It could be that is the main reason of what we are seeing. Arri always talk about better pixels, not necessarily more. We also see that the new A7sIII can deliver 4k images look as good as 8k from other cameras. But it might be that BM have made something that combine both worlds. Better and more pixels. A smaller sensor that delivers rich large format feel will also be revolutionary because of the possibilities with more lens chooses. The cost ratio will have a huge impact for many of us. Hope they can deliver something like this on a smaller size camera.
Offline
User avatar

Robert Niessner

  • Posts: 3061
  • Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:51 am
  • Location: Graz, Austria

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostTue Aug 04, 2020 8:40 am

My guess is that the white pixels covering true luminance add to the perceived dimensional depth, like a bump map in 3D animation. And the high res and CFA of the sensor amplifies the lens characteristics but without adding its own sensor characteristics too much - so it might be a more neutral sensor than the other BM sensors before.
Robert Niessner
LAUFBILDkommission
Graz / Austria
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Blackmagic Camera Blog (German):
http://laufbildkommission.wordpress.com

Read the blog in English via Google Translate:
http://tinyurl.com/pjf6a3m
Offline

Oyvind Fiksdal

  • Posts: 354
  • Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostTue Aug 04, 2020 9:48 am

Interesting thoughts Robert.

If I understand you correctly. It could be something with the white pixels and the combination that there are so many pixels (12K) that the whole image acts like a true RGB sensor when downscaled to lower resolution. But in this case, you have added a white sub-pixel not normally present in a standard RGB sensor. Thus, making a deeper textured image with the benefit of clarifying details in richer, not sharper, way. This is not logical when shooting at lower resolution, but at higher resolution both surprising and somehow strangely logical.

As I mentioned in another forum. Someone should make a 70mm IMAX, vs URSA12K, vs ARRI-65 comparison test. That would be interesting…
Offline
User avatar

Robert Niessner

  • Posts: 3061
  • Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:51 am
  • Location: Graz, Austria

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostTue Aug 04, 2020 10:16 am

Oyvind Fiksdal wrote:Interesting thoughts Robert.

If I understand you correctly. It could be something with the white pixels and the combination that there are so many pixels (12K) that the whole image acts like a true RGB sensor when downscaled to lower resolution. But in this case, you have added a white sub-pixel not normally present in a standard RGB sensor. Thus, making a deeper textured image with the benefit of clarifying details in richer, not sharper, way. This is not logical when shooting at lower resolution, but at higher resolution both surprising and somehow strangely logical.


Exactly. Normally with a Bayer sensor you would get less texture the darker the shadows. But the white (or clear) pixels do see more into the shadows without interpolation like with green pixels. So you get more defined depth in the dark parts (which also won't get smeared away that easy by compression).
Robert Niessner
LAUFBILDkommission
Graz / Austria
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Blackmagic Camera Blog (German):
http://laufbildkommission.wordpress.com

Read the blog in English via Google Translate:
http://tinyurl.com/pjf6a3m
Offline

Oyvind Fiksdal

  • Posts: 354
  • Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostTue Aug 04, 2020 12:31 pm

Robert Niessner wrote:
Oyvind Fiksdal wrote:Interesting thoughts Robert.

If I understand you correctly. It could be something with the white pixels and the combination that there are so many pixels (12K) that the whole image acts like a true RGB sensor when downscaled to lower resolution. But in this case, you have added a white sub-pixel not normally present in a standard RGB sensor. Thus, making a deeper textured image with the benefit of clarifying details in richer, not sharper, way. This is not logical when shooting at lower resolution, but at higher resolution both surprising and somehow strangely logical.


Exactly. Normally with a Bayer sensor you would get less texture the darker the shadows. But the white (or clear) pixels do see more into the shadows without interpolation like with green pixels. So you get more defined depth in the dark parts (which also won't get smeared away that easy by compression).


Yes I see your point. Its hard to put a finger on, but I believe we now witness a sensor that deliver superior shadow rolloff. When looking at the first image, masterfully done by Note btw. It’s like the whole area is lit by a massive soft box even though we see its obviously lit by a much harder golden hour sun. There is a perfect smooth transition between the shadow area and midtones, which is often hard to achieve without adding fill light. The information is there.

Note, bring on some more caps. inspiring stuff ;)
Offline
User avatar

Adam Langdon

  • Posts: 381
  • Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:15 pm
  • Location: Ohio USA

Re: Some stills from the Ursa Mini Pro 12K

PostTue Aug 04, 2020 1:04 pm

Oyvind Fiksdal wrote:Yes I see your point. Its hard to put a finger on, but I believe we now witness a sensor that deliver superior shadow rolloff. When looking at the first image, masterfully done by Note btw. It’s like the whole area is lit by a massive soft box even though we see its obviously lit by a much harder golden hour sun. There is a perfect smooth transition between the shadow area and midtones, which is often hard to achieve without adding fill light. The information is there.


I think that's it, or at least it feels completely unique. I still want to see some high contrast (highlight roll-off) stuff, but the fact that both ends of the DR look REALLY nice.... its really something special.
Ursa Mini Pro - Vintage Russian Glass - Contax Zeiss Set - Tamron 24-70mm f2.8

Return to Cinematography

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Csaba Nagy, Hendrik Proosa and 34 guests