BMCC M4/3 Speedbooster comparison

The place for questions about shooting with Blackmagic Cameras.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

LoganStewartDP

  • Posts: 208
  • Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:12 am
  • Location: Las Vegas, NV

BMCC M4/3 Speedbooster comparison

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 8:20 am

Proud new owner of a M4/3 Blackmagic Cinema Camera. Just got my Metabones speed booster in and after spending almost $500 I wanted to see if it did all the things it claimed.

Logan Stewart DP
Variables Of Light LLC
www.variablesoflight.com
Offline

Robert Betzner

  • Posts: 442
  • Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:54 am
  • Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: BMCC M4/3 Speedbooster comparison

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 9:02 am

To be honest - you can see almost nothing in your video. Shoot something where you can judge contrast, sharpness etc. This video is almost meaningless. Especially because you didn't mentioned what brand of glass you used and what kind of speedbooster this is (Nikon? EF?)

It could be very interesting. But right now it doesn't help at all. Sorry.


Cheers
Offline
User avatar

Uli Plank

  • Posts: 25487
  • Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:48 am
  • Location: Germany and Indonesia

Re: BMCC M4/3 Speedbooster comparison

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 9:41 am

I tested mine on a GH2, not in video only, but shooting photos of test charts.

Mine is the C/Y version and I tested with some of the best glass from Zeiss. It does everything it claims. Center is even sharper than original, edges are only a tad softer – in photography. Invisible in video.
My disaster protection: export a .drp file to a physically separated storage regularly.
Please visit digitalproduction.com/author/uliplank/

Studio 19.1.3
2017 iMac, MacOS 13.7.4, eGPU
MacBook M1 Pro and M4 Pro mini, MacOS 14.7.5
SE, USM G3
Offline

sebasti

  • Posts: 70
  • Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 8:45 am

Re: BMCC M4/3 Speedbooster comparison

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 10:49 am

Can't really tell anything from this test. And to be honest, I don't really care if speedbooster actually boosts speed. The situations where you want to shoot wide open are not that many. Thing that matters is that if you have a set of one brand lenses and you mix the shots with them with and without speedbooster they still retain the same look. Then even more important thing is that if the speed booster delivers good quality image and doesn't introduce new optical errors like chromatic aberration.
Offline

Roberto de la Torre

  • Posts: 112
  • Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 1:01 pm

Re: BMCC M4/3 Speedbooster comparison

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 11:18 am

Anamorphic,Speedbooster,BM...cool! Love the idea,perhaps for the Pocket too.
But what´s that? Just a candle :?

Please,make something than we can see something ;)

Thanks
Roberto de la Torre

Comic book,storyboard,cinematography........and more
Offline
User avatar

Lorenzo Straight

  • Posts: 267
  • Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:52 am
  • Location: Atlanta, Ga

Re: BMCC M4/3 Speedbooster comparison

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 12:11 pm

Thanks for sharing. So, what's your thoughts? It is amazing how it adds that little that was desired;)
I needed to see this test to make a final decision.
MSI GS60 Ghost Pro-4K-605-2.7 GHz Intel Core i7-5700HQ (Broadwell)-16GB of 1600 MHz DDR3L RAM-1TB 7200 rpm HDD + 128GB M.2 SSD-NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M GPU (6GB GDDR5)-15.6" UHD + 4K IPS Display-3840 x 2160
-Windows 8.1
Offline

Jules Bushell

  • Posts: 1026
  • Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 3:06 am
  • Location: London, England

Re: BMCC M4/3 Speedbooster comparison

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 3:12 pm

Mustn't also forget how it lessens the crop factor. You could get a Sigma 18-35mm and it would handle standard wides and normal FOV.

I have nothing but praise for the Nikon G to MFT speed booster. I like the fact it's a tight fit and nothing on it wobbles too. Was hoping for clickless aperture ring but can't have it all.

Jules
Jules Bushell
url: www.nonmultiplexcinema.com
url: www.filmmeansbusiness.com
url: www.blurtheline.co.uk
Offline
User avatar

Mark de Jeu

  • Posts: 116
  • Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 6:42 pm
  • Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: BMCC M4/3 Speedbooster comparison

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 4:25 pm

I don't think it could hurt to send an email to the engineering team at Metabones to let them know about the desire for a click-less aperture. support@metabones.com
Mark de Jeu
Video Enthusiast
Offline

LoganStewartDP

  • Posts: 208
  • Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:12 am
  • Location: Las Vegas, NV

Re: BMCC M4/3 Speedbooster comparison

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 6:48 pm

Btw metabones does everything their product claims to do. This is just a test to see how it performs on a rather soft lens wide open, also how it handles halation and if it would cause any issues when used in conjunction with an anamorphic adapter. I lit it with only a candle because essentially the 1.4 f stop just became an f/1.0 and I wanted to test the dynamic range of the camera and how far it will dig into the shadows.

Lens is an old Nikkor 50 1.4 (pre ai)

If this test does nothing for you then go out and make your own. :D
Logan Stewart DP
Variables Of Light LLC
www.variablesoflight.com

Return to Cinematography

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Johannes Hoffmann, Mattias Murhagen, Peter Schuster and 58 guests