I don't need to say too much here. But, Blackmagic Design is in the prime position to rule this arena.
Wireless Output from the Camera to an on set DIT/COLORIST that creates the look that gets Linked-In with the RAW file. I'm going to have a fun play on LinkedIn.com there. Laugh if you will, but I like bad puns.
I also want Blackmagic Design to work on creating four to five potential outputs: 1) CAMERA OPERATOR, 2) ASSISTANT CAMERA OP, 3) DIT/COLORIST, 4) DOP/CINEMATOGRAPHER, 5) VIDEO VILLAGE. Each output page should allow for options for viewing the image. Currently BMD allows three. So, what is two more?
I'll be honest, the LCD/Viewfinder would fall under CAM OP. But building in Wireless protocol and adding device connection protocol for display parameters makes sense. So that way you can do all that you want. A Wireless Video Assist remains important for ACs. A Wireless UltraStudio for DIT makes sense. Wireless for DOP & VIDEO VILLAGE is extra on top. But those monitors should simply display what the DIT decides for LUT off the RAW LOG Signal. The camera captures more data in RAW, but you can work off that file as a DIT.
All this goes back to the wonder of DaVinci Resolve, and Blackmagic creating a camera system nine-years-ago. This is entirely possible. Blackmagic can rule in this space with this potential image control pipeline.
And, remember I didn't mention wireless lens control until now, but if BMD did their own for the AC then it would give them a bigger stranglehold on this market. Why? Communication is key to all of this, and what better company is poised for post workflow and camera communication than a company making camera capture and editing/finishing software and hardware.
I'm excited.
Wireless Output from the Camera to an on set DIT/COLORIST that creates the look that gets Linked-In with the RAW file. I'm going to have a fun play on LinkedIn.com there. Laugh if you will, but I like bad puns.
I also want Blackmagic Design to work on creating four to five potential outputs: 1) CAMERA OPERATOR, 2) ASSISTANT CAMERA OP, 3) DIT/COLORIST, 4) DOP/CINEMATOGRAPHER, 5) VIDEO VILLAGE. Each output page should allow for options for viewing the image. Currently BMD allows three. So, what is two more?
I'll be honest, the LCD/Viewfinder would fall under CAM OP. But building in Wireless protocol and adding device connection protocol for display parameters makes sense. So that way you can do all that you want. A Wireless Video Assist remains important for ACs. A Wireless UltraStudio for DIT makes sense. Wireless for DOP & VIDEO VILLAGE is extra on top. But those monitors should simply display what the DIT decides for LUT off the RAW LOG Signal. The camera captures more data in RAW, but you can work off that file as a DIT.
All this goes back to the wonder of DaVinci Resolve, and Blackmagic creating a camera system nine-years-ago. This is entirely possible. Blackmagic can rule in this space with this potential image control pipeline.
And, remember I didn't mention wireless lens control until now, but if BMD did their own for the AC then it would give them a bigger stranglehold on this market. Why? Communication is key to all of this, and what better company is poised for post workflow and camera communication than a company making camera capture and editing/finishing software and hardware.
I'm excited.
"I'm well trained in the art of turning **** to gold." - Tim Buttner (timbutt2)
Cameras: URSA Mini Pro G2 & Pocket 6K Pro
Past: UM4.6K, P6K, BMCC 2.5K
Computers: iMac 5K (Mid 2020) & MacBook Pro Retina 15.4in (Mid 2018)
Cameras: URSA Mini Pro G2 & Pocket 6K Pro
Past: UM4.6K, P6K, BMCC 2.5K
Computers: iMac 5K (Mid 2020) & MacBook Pro Retina 15.4in (Mid 2018)