Fri May 10, 2019 1:32 am
There is old over 30 stop sensor technology with great colour. Unfortunately, the cinema companies don't want to adopt the technology. What's happening is that the Alexa looks OK, and this closer you get to 16/17 the more close it looks to our understanding of how things look in real life.
But John, you misunderstand it, with extreme dynamic ranges, you decide what clips, and how the clip looks. You can decide where to put the range and preserve a natural look, or a wide range look etc. You can film in broad daylight without filters and make it lok like night time and the sun look like the moon. You. An emulate dusk etc, because all the data is there to do it without clipping or other unreasonable constraints.
Rick and guys, the next big thing is not only glasses free high framerate, dynamic range, colour gamut, bit depth 3D, its computational photography. I am currently looking at his to design a cheap 24k camera. Once the next giant leap in computer circuit technology happens (working on that) it will be easy. At the moment it can be done, but a bit of a struggle on silicon, even with all the stuff I know about (10x+ performance increase on cpu processing, maybe 100x+ maybe on asic with some ideas, yes there is actually a good is a God hybrid scheme coming to mind). The memory solution I have in mind is cheap to and many times more memory. It would be medium format a should fit on your pocket (cargo pants, like the current pocket). Big investment and lots of skills needed, and some good industry connections to get the tech together, way outside a garage development. Maybe a few years of high level development. Cheap, buy 10.
Anyway, computational photography, allows you to artistically jig the image how you like. Been thinking about techniques for a very long time, and knew a guy that seems to be doing in a business what I had previously planned many years before. The technology is out there now and should be hitting pro production already, but I've loss contact with the guy (super secretive).
So, yes, a few quality steps and then you could get a pro video quality 24k computational photography video camera in your pocket.
Rick, Apple etc hasn't peaked, I'm a king of WT_ designs, there is plenty they could do. But when you get big companies they get bloated and slow, and they get the wrong people working there and in charge, it limits. It's not that more can t be done, you should see my mobile phone designs. But inevitably performance and quality increases reach a point where more is not so good, and good new design trends for end users runs out.
You then need to do something better. A long time ago I planned a company much bigger than google or apple, they simply aren't doing as much as they could. I've been back dooring google for years get improvements into android, because I already knew how to do it from my own design work. That is what it is like, a lot of theae things are obvious, yet year after year they aren't implemented in android, until I get annoyed enough, and send them a message, then withing one or two development cycles, its there is some form (not his I would choose to do it most of the time). A lot of people have problems with the obvious. So things are not as advanced as you might think behind the scenes in companies. Where as I'm the sort of person which figures out new ways to mame development teams to increase quality, security and efficiency. So, if a team can't get what they know right and miss the obvious, how are they going come up with the ground breakingly new on a regular basis. These companies also buy in others designs, which the customer then thinks they innovated on. It's that bad.
aIf you are not truthfully progressive, maybe you shouldn't say anything
bTruthful side topics in-line with or related to, the discussion accepted
cOften people deceive themselves so much they do not understand, even when the truth is explained to them