Kholi wrote:The newest Macbook Retinas had faulty screens depending on when you got them. They suffered from burn in, and Apple (mega corp here) didn't acknowledge it publicly at ALL. After so many complaints and returned laptops, they 'quietly' changed their panel supplier and most of the newest shipments are fine.
I'm a pretty broke/moneyless shooter, I had finally been able to grab a macbook retina in preparation for this camera and when I started reading Apple's own forums about the issue? Pretty terrifying!
Were you able to get a MacBook Pro with Retina screen that is issue free in the end? Did you have to return it several times to get a Samsung manufactured one? As far as I know, the issue still isn't resolved... Apple's quality control has gone downhill over the past few years. I had 3 replacements, 2 had Image Retention issues (LG manufactured screens) and the last one didn't (Samsung screen), but the bottom of the screen looked piss-yellow. I have since returned it and ordered a classic MacBook Pro with HiRes AntiGlare screen, however this display has some serious backlight issues, visible in the Photoshop and Lightroom interface (because it's grey), so that's a deal breaker for me. I'm thinking about returning it within Apple's holiday returns period (till 7th January 2013) and trying my luck with a Retina MacBook Pro again. After all, that's the product I actually wanted. The screen issues are just so frustrating considering the Retina display is the whole selling point of that model
If the Mac Mini didn't only have an Intel HD 4000 graphics chip, I'd probably get a maxed out Mac Mini + self-calibrating 27" Eizo screen. Yes, it would be a desktop Mac, but a rather portable one if you keep one screen at home and one at work. The 2012 MacMini (maxed out) reaches over 12000 in GeekBench. I doubt the integrated graphics would be powerful enough for (light) Resolve usage though (?) Would Resolve even run on that?