Re: Ursa Mini Pro 12K is here
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2020 5:02 pm
Howard Roll wrote:Map the 12K image 1:1 on a 100" diagonal monitor and it becomes a retina screen at 25" or greater.
If your eye was a s35mm sensor you'd need a <6mm lens to have a wide enough FOV to resolve the full image.
The reality is that our eye can only resolve about 3 or 4K and that's probably being generous.
To see the threshhold of diffraction limiting on the 12K you need 2-4X zoom, that factor will change the perceptual threshhold. Meaning if you can only see 3K the effects of diffraction won't become perceptually noticeable until ~F8.
Fun Fact: The UM12k has more color receptors than the human eye.
Fun Fact #2: Every 2/3" 4K Broadcast camera has the ~same pixel pitch as the 12k and has since the dawn of 4K.
Good Luck
Depends on FOV, you need something you can't resolve, to not see pixels, like I do on my 4k TV. I didn't think it would be that bad in any situation, but there are some times where I do, when well enough. 24k for the full field of view, but above 70 degree just gets more and more useless in standard study telling.
I advocate 4k for standard delivery, 8k for special projects, maybe even 16k fur a wedding, as obsessed people are going to walk up to a video wall to check things out one day (they can pay extra extra for that). Few older people can see as well as me on mega nutrients and a $1000 glasses I get really well scripted. And maybe not even half can see 4k. Lots more younger people though. Anyway, for those who can't see 8k or 4k, 2k is probably ok.