Blackmagic Forum

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:31 am**

Dear Mr. Grant Petty
I really appreciate what you did for the independent film industry.
and I am eternally glad to own a pocket camera
10-Bit ProRes OTB for 995$ it's really unbelievable!
but this is not exactly what I was paying for

I have just only one question:
WHY HERE
blackmagicdesign.com/products/blackmagicpocketcinemacamera
you didn't put HUGE notice what you camera still can't shoot in "RAW Lossles CinemaDNG"
and WHY you didn't say anything on the main page blackmagicdesign.com when we can expect a firmware update. Or maybe you think that it is not necessary?

I was in serious confusion when i open the box with my BMPCC camera and I spent probably 30 minutes of reading manual trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong and why I can not turn on DNG in Recording Format.

PLEASE UPDATE INFORMATION ON POCKET CAMERA MAIN PAGE ABOUT CAMERA INABILITY TO SHOOT IN lossless CinemaDNG RAW FORMAT BEFORE FUTURE FIRMWARE UPDATE WILL BE RELEASED
AND PLEASE DON'T F**K AROUD WHIT YOUR CUSTOMERS WHO ARE ALREADY VERY COMMITTED TO THE BLACKMAGIC

Thank you!

UPD

For the last almost 2 weeks 2050 people somehow found this post.
But no one from BMD team.

Again just silence...

Not a single word from Black Magic team on this website about RAW on BMPCC...
or date of update...
Or I'm looking for information in wrong place? do I need to check some Instagram?

Acording to this page (F@#* "Information: You are not allowed to post URLs!")
blackmagicdesign.com/products/blackmagicpocketcinemacamera
it steel look like i'm an idiot, cause my (and all other) BMPCC can shoot RAW just now without any problem...

Mr. Grant Petty
Maybe You can give as a public beta version of "RAW" firmware for BMPCC?
I believe many of us can be happy with that.
Also it can be helpful for BM to, we can give a lot of feedback.
Anyway it can be better than nothing...

p.s. sorry for my English

Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera BMPCC can't don't not no shoot film record in RAW DNG Lossless CinemaDNG . Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera BMPCC can't don't not shoot film in RAW DNG Lossless CinemaDNG . Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera BMPCC can't don't not shoot film in RAW DNG Lossless CinemaDNG . Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera BMPCC can't don't not shoot film in RAW DNG Lossless CinemaDNG . Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera BMPCC can't don't not shoot film in RAW DNG Lossless CinemaDNG . Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera BMPCC can't don't not shoot film in RAW DNG Lossless CinemaDNG .#Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera #BMPCC #Don't have #Can't shoot #Not #No #RAW #DNG #Lossless CinemaDNG #Firmware #Update

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:44 am**

Coming soon to the Pocket....RAW
pic.twitter.com/0FX528DZqD John Brawley (@brawlster) October 11, 2013

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:11 am**

Ivan Lee wrote:
Coming soon to the Pocket....RAW
pic.twitter.com/0FX528DZqD John Brawley (@brawlster) October 11, 2013

Amazing timing on that one, JB to the rescue again!

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:14 am**

I read about the coming raw on BMCuser before this topic was posted.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:15 am**

Some POCKET CINEMA CAMERA DNG frames shot with the @slrmagic 12mm https://copy.com/s36D39T6q7oa

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:20 am**

the shots look quite good. cant wait for the release!!!

but.... why did they get rid of the monorail!!!

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:49 am**

Cool!
For sure we will see RAW update soon, i hope)
I already very happy about what this baby can do in ProRes.

I'm just talking about it's "a bit" not serious when i need to look this information in twitter... instead of see this information on BlackMagicDesign MAIN PAGE!
It will be fair to give the people a chance to know about this issue before they bought the camera.
Just simply because it is normal to tell the truth, to respect the customers! Because nobody like to be cheated.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 7:08 am**

More negative complaining?
No raw was certainly well publicised before the first cameras started to ship. Anyone could drop out and ask for their deposit back.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 8:30 am**

RAW is in the hands of beta testers as we speak. It's on the way. Soon gentlemen, soon.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 9:03 am**

When is the release? Are we talking Months, Weeks, Days, Hours, Minutes??????

Also any idea about the cards? will they have to be at least 95mb's extreme Pros?

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 10:58 am**

you should be warned that my attempt to get future firmware updates on the BMCC, or even awnsers about possibility of them has been shuffled off into the "off-topic" forum to hide them.

BM will not awnser ANY questions regarding firmware. Apparently they feel you don't deserve to know if your camera will ever even be capable of what they might promise.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 11:00 am**

Yes, I think 95mb speed is a must.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 11:04 am**

Current testers are saying that each frame is averaging 2MB a frame. at 30 fps, it'll be 60mbs a second, at the average end.

You'll most definitely have to go with the 95MB sandisk extreme pros.

Guys, it's in the testers hands, that means soon. when exactly, no one will know. but the fact that its out there should be enough to calm ridiculous claims that bmd is intentional trying to screw you.

It's on its way, let's make sure it gets done right. People whined about the BMPC delay, then orb issues came out. maybe people would've been saved more time had the product been refined a bit more.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 1:11 pm**

Do all of us here REALLY need RAW that desperately? I am quite hesitant to even consider that I may use it on paid gigs. Play with it - maybe. But to integrate RAW into my production workflow would require a major overhaul of that said workflow, and a few extra thousands of dollars.

I imagine that most of us who are so impatient for the Pocket Camera to arrive (I do have mine, finally!) and have RAW, aren't probably dealing with clients who are asking for RAW and are willing to pay for it. If you do have those clients, you probably already own the original BMCC, or RED, or whatever, and the Pocket Camera won't make it or break it for you.

RAW is coming, no questions about that. In the meantime, I am blown away by what ProRes can do and I think it's more than I need.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 1:27 pm**

I saw this post today and it made me happy ...

Seems like it should be right around the corner ... (i own a bmcc EF)

http://nofilmschool.com/2013/10/raw-support-coming-soon-blackmagic-pocket-cinema-camera/

I think the delay is due to the unified firmware strategy they're trying to implement. They probably don't want to release anything until the 4k camera is out, so as not to have 1000049949 different firmware versions/updates

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 1:55 pm**

Let's see it that way: it's only been two months since the first Pocket cams were shipped - even if it feels a lot longer, probably due to the long wait for the camera itself before. They said that raw would come later through a firmware update, and now they are close to delivering said update. Nothing to be angry about.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 2:01 pm**

Eienn wrote:I have just only one question:
WHY HERE
blackmagicdesign.com/products/blackmagicpocketcinemacamera
you didn't put HUGE notice what you camera still can't shoot in "RAW Lossles CinemaDNG"
and WHY you didn't say anything on the main page blackmagicdesign.com when we can expect a firmware update. Or maybe you think that it is not necessary?

I was in serious confusion when i open the box with my BMPCC camera and I spent probably 30 minutes of reading manual trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong and why I can not turn on DNG in Recording Format.

This came in the box.

: RAW.jpg (6.66 KiB) Viewed 10793 times

Don't blame anyone else if you didn't have your glasses on.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 3:38 pm**

Pablito wrote:
This came in the box.
RAW.jpg

Don't blame anyone else if you didn't have your glasses on.

That was not in my box, by the way.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 3:56 pm**

Rob Ford wrote:
Pablito wrote:
This came in the box.
RAW.jpg

Don't blame anyone else if you didn't have your glasses on.

That was not in my box, by the way.

Yeah, also not in mine. But the Pocket was awesome on my trip to Japan! If only I wasn't so shaky while shooting...

Matthew

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:06 pm**

This is good news. I am not in a big hurry for raw on my pocket cam, but I would like to know if compressed raw will be available in the BMCC, that would be very useful.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:07 pm**

Rob Ford wrote:
Pablito wrote:
This came in the box.
RAW.jpg

Don't blame anyone else if you didn't have your glasses on.

That was not in my box, by the way.

Wasn't in mine either. I knew about it, but I agree it should be clearly stated on the website.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:14 pm**

There was no notice in my box.

Printing that it has RAW on the package when it doesn't should be a punishable offense, if it isn't already.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:23 pm**

http://www.cracked.com/article_19485_5-outrageous-lies-companies-are-legally-allowed-to-tell-you.html

Read #5

Just be happy that RAW will come...unlike these examples of reputable companies such as Apple, Nokia and Coca Cola making completely baseless claims of features their product is 100% incapable of ever performing.

Glad to see that RAW is going to be available in the not so distant future. ProRes is just fine for me now, but the possibility of RAW in this form factor has me excited.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:45 pm**

innerspark wrote:Current testers are saying that each frame is averaging 2MB a frame. at 30 fps, it'll be 60mbs a second, at the average end.

You'll most definitely have to go with the 95MB sandisk extreme pros.

Guys, it's in the testers hands, that means soon. when exactly, no one will know. but the fact that its out there should be enough to calm ridiculous claims that bmd is intentional trying to screw you.

It's on its way, let's make sure it gets done right. People whined about the BMPC delay, then orb issues came out. maybe people would've been saved more time had the product been refined a bit more.

Can any SD cards actually write that fast though? Usually the nominal speed on the card is the read speed, the write speed is a lot lower.

Posted: **Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:58 pm**

Mac Jaeger wrote:Let's see it that way: it's only been two months since the first Pocket cams were shipped - even if it feels a lot longer, probably due to the long wait for the camera itself before. They said that raw would come later through a firmware update, and now they are close to delivering said update. Nothing to be angry about.

They might be planning to do it after shipping, but in that case the claim should not have been printed on the box. They could always modify the box after implementing it. The average person buying these cameras are probably not following these boards on a frequent basis - they would only come to the web site when there was a problem, and finding out that there isn't actually RAW would take digging on their part.

In any case, if a manufacturer prints a claim of a feature on the box, a buyer should have a reasonable expectation that the item in the box actually supports that feature. It is also reasonable for the buyer to get upset when they find out through trial and error that it doesn't. That is why most reputable companies don't do it.

IMO what happened is that the box is another example of a lapse of QC in BM's production. The boxes should never have been used to ship product out in. It almost seems as if they don't have a QC department, or if they do, they should get a new one.

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 1:09 am**

Natal wrote:
Mac Jaeger wrote:Let's see it that way: it's only been two months since the first Pocket cams were shipped - even if it feels a lot longer, probably due to the long wait for the camera itself before. They said that raw would come later through a firmware update, and now they are close to delivering said update. Nothing to be angry about.

They might be planning to do it after shipping, but in that case the claim should not have been printed on the box. They could always modify the box after implementing it. The average person buying these cameras are probably not following these boards on a frequent basis - they would only come to the web site when there was a problem, and finding out that there isn't actually RAW would take digging on their part.

In any case, if a manufacturer prints a claim of a feature on the box, a buyer should have a reasonable expectation that the item in the box actually supports that feature. It is also reasonable for the buyer to get upset when they find out through trial and error that it doesn't. That is why most reputable companies don't do it.

IMO what happened is that the box is another example of a lapse of QC in BM's production. The boxes should never have been used to ship product out in. It almost seems as if they don't have a QC department, or if they do, they should get a new one.

Maybe they were to busy working on raw to change the box. It looks like it is close to ready and will be a wonderful bonus in my opinion.

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 1:18 am**

By the time people can actually see the boxes (on shelves) before buying, the printed promise might already hold true. Right now all cameras sold were either preordered long before the boxes were even printed, or at least bought after gathering information on the internet. You'll be hard pressed to find one single person that walked into some store, read the box (and only the box) and decided "hey, cool camera, i think i'll buy one".

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 1:35 am**

Reality is, 99% of BMPC users don't care about any of this. They are happily using the camera, and eagerly awaiting raw - soon to come.
A few disgruntled people have started multipole threads on this forum, using highly emotive language like "lies'.

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 1:41 am**

I want raw, I own a BMCC, I bought the BMPC hoping for raw fast, now as far are whats printed on the box, there should be a sticker over raw, come to the east coast, you can buy these in stores today

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 3:30 am**

Pretty soon actually. John Brawley has it right now.

http://news.doddleme.com/equipment/raw- ... ma-camera/

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:13 pm**

chrisso wrote:More negative complaining?
No raw was certainly well publicised before the first cameras started to ship. Anyone could drop out and ask for their deposit back.

Acceptance of mediocrity again?

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:22 pm**

Worzel Gummidge wrote:
chrisso wrote:More negative complaining?
No raw was certainly well publicised before the first cameras started to ship. Anyone could drop out and ask for their deposit back.

Acceptance of mediocrity again?

+1

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:27 pm**

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:35 pm**

chrisso wrote:More negative complaining?
No raw was certainly well publicised before the first cameras started to ship. Anyone could drop out and ask for their deposit back.

NOOOOO I dont agree with you at all. BM must tell at anytime RAW was not in the cam and precise when the firmware will be ready.
It's not the third world for godsake, it's seem worst...
And if you personally happy without raw, just shut your mouth dum...

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:37 pm**

shanepeters@bellsouth.net wrote:you should be warned that my attempt to get future firmware updates on the BMCC, or even awnsers about possibility of them has been shuffled off into the "off-topic" forum to hide them.

BM will not awnser ANY questions regarding firmware. Apparently they feel you don't deserve to know if your camera will ever even be capable of what they might promise.

+1

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:38 pm**

timhashko wrote:Do all of us here REALLY need RAW that desperately? I am quite hesitant to even consider that I may use it on paid gigs. Play with it - maybe. But to integrate RAW into my production workflow would require a major overhaul of that said workflow, and a few extra thousands of dollars.

I imagine that most of us who are so impatient for the Pocket Camera to arrive (I do have mine, finally!) and have RAW, aren't probably dealing with clients who are asking for RAW and are willing to pay for it. If you do have those clients, you probably already own the original BMCC, or RED, or whatever, and the Pocket Camera won't make it or break it for you.

RAW is coming, no questions about that. In the meantime, I am blown away by what ProRes can do and I think it's more than I need.

Just shut up then if you dont need raw....

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:41 pm**

Mac Jaeger wrote:Let's see it that way: it's only been two months since the first Pocket cams were shipped - even if it feels a lot longer, probably due to the long wait for the camera itself before. They said that raw would come later through a firmware update, and now they are close to delivering said update. Nothing to be angry about.

Of course dear... We just need not to be cheated by a lie on the box, on the website and on all revues.... We need to know if it's for this year or next year.... Are you happy to buy something different from what you were expecting ?? That's youor problem not ours....

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 5:06 pm**

chrisso wrote:Reality is, 99% of BMPC users don't care about any of this. They are happily using the camera, and eagerly awaiting raw - soon to come.
A few disgruntled people have started multipole threads on this forum, using highly emotive language like "lies'.

Of course dear... We just need not to be cheated by a lie on the box, on the website and on all revues.... We need to know if it's for this year or next year.... Are you happy to buy something different from what you were expecting ?? That's your problem not our... And what about a class action for misleading advertising ?

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 5:08 pm**

Steve DiMaggio wrote:I want raw, I own a BMCC, I bought the BMPC hoping for raw fast, now as far are whats printed on the box, there should be a sticker over raw, come to the east coast, you can buy these in stores today

+1

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:18 pm**

surfer030303 wrote:
chrisso wrote:Reality is, 99% of BMPC users don't care about any of this. They are happily using the camera, and eagerly awaiting raw - soon to come.
A few disgruntled people have started multipole threads on this forum, using highly emotive language like "lies'.

Of course dear... We just need not to be cheated by a lie on the box, on the website and on all revues.... We need to know if it's for this year or next year.... Are you happy to buy something different from what you were expecting ?? That's your problem not our... And what about a class action for misleading advertising ?

Their customer service isn't exactly impressive, but their advertising is only bogus if they don't deliver raw on the pocket at all. Late isn't the same as never.

I'm hoping that they'll give us raw soon also, but it's not going to stop me from shooting with it in the meantime. And as most of us have already realized, even in ProRes, the image quality we're getting from these cameras is incredible. Everyone that I've been shooing for lately has been very happy with the footage (except for the one dolt who didn't understand the concept of color grading), and it's all been ProRes.

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 7:58 pm**

surfer030303 wrote:
Mac Jaeger wrote:Let's see it that way: it's only been two months since the first Pocket cams were shipped - even if it feels a lot longer, probably due to the long wait for the camera itself before. They said that raw would come later through a firmware update, and now they are close to delivering said update. Nothing to be angry about.

Of course dear... We just need not to be cheated by a lie on the box, on the website and on all revues.... We need to know if it's for this year or next year.... Are you happy to buy something different from what you were expecting ?? That's youor problem not ours....

"Of course dear..." ?!?

Watch your tone.

Actually it's the other way round: you are unhappy because you bought a camera that does not yet do what you expeceted it to do - but it's your fault when you didn't read one single review of the camera, and just went with what was printed onto a box (which i am sure you had _not_ seen before you ordered the camera...).

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:40 pm**

Post from John (Twitter)

@travisfish you definitely need to get the 95mb/a sandisk extreme pro
@fenner403 The compression is variable. Anywhere between 2.0- 2.4mb per frame

- RED -

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:53 pm**

surfer030303 wrote:[

Of course dear... We just need not to be cheated by a lie on the box, on the website and on all revues....

You're posting on a forum now aren't you.
Anyone buying new technology has to do due diligence and research it online first.
No raw as yet has been a hot topic in every pocket camera forum debate, and has been mentioned in every review I've read.
If you didn't know there was currently no raw, you haven't done enough research. But I suspect it's just another over blown gripe by which to hammer BMD by people who seem to live to hammer BMD - just like the delivery date and the blooming sensor.

Posted: **Sat Oct 12, 2013 10:10 pm**

chrisso wrote:
surfer030303 wrote:[

Of course dear... We just need not to be cheated by a lie on the box, on the website and on all revues....

You're posting on a forum now aren't you.
Anyone buying new technology has to do due diligence and research it online first.
No raw as yet has been a hot topic in every pocket camera forum debate, and has been mentioned in every review I've read.
If you didn't know there was currently no raw, you haven't done enough research. But I suspect it's just another over blown gripe by which to hammer BMD by people who seem to live to hammer BMD - just like the delivery date and the blooming sensor.

+1

Posted: **Sun Oct 13, 2013 1:06 am**

surfer030303 wrote:
timhashko wrote:Do all of us here REALLY need RAW that desperately? I am quite hesitant to even consider that I may use it on paid gigs. Play with it - maybe. But to integrate RAW into my production workflow would require a major overhaul of that said workflow, and a few extra thousands of dollars.

I imagine that most of us who are so impatient for the Pocket Camera to arrive (I do have mine, finally!) and have RAW, aren't probably dealing with clients who are asking for RAW and are willing to pay for it. If you do have those clients, you probably already own the original BMCC, or RED, or whatever, and the Pocket Camera won't make it or break it for you.

RAW is coming, no questions about that. In the meantime, I am blown away by what ProRes can do and I think it's more than I need.

Just shut up then if you dont need raw....

Yes sir! Apologies if anything offended you.

Posted: **Sun Oct 13, 2013 11:00 am**

Mac Jaeger wrote:
surfer030303 wrote:
Mac Jaeger wrote:Let's see it that way: it's only been two months since the first Pocket cams were shipped - even if it feels a lot longer, probably due to the long wait for the camera itself before. They said that raw would come later through a firmware update, and now they are close to delivering said update. Nothing to be angry about.

Of course dear... We just need not to be cheated by a lie on the box, on the website and on all revues.... We need to know if it's for this year or next year.... Are you happy to buy something different from what you were expecting ?? That's youor problem not ours....

"Of course dear..." ?!?

Watch your tone.

Actually it's the other way round: you are unhappy because you bought a camera that does not yet do what you expeceted it to do - but it's your fault when you didn't read one single review of the camera, and just went with what was printed onto a box (which i am sure you had _not_ seen before you ordered the camera...).

Sorry for my tone... I didn't want to offend you.
I am not unhappy at all. I am using my cam in Prores. And I am HAPPY !
But your argument is invalid for me: as I pre order this cam, like a lot of people on this forum, NO review at that time was pointing the non-raw delivery...
When I red all the reviews , I was not enough strong to cancel and wait (let me think, did I say "wait") ? Oh yeah but - and that's the point - HOW LONG would I wait ????
The one and only problem about RAW with this cam is JUST the fact that BM stayed SILENT until someone started to complain about this non commercial attitude.
That's all.

Posted: **Sun Oct 13, 2013 11:26 am**

chrisso wrote:
surfer030303 wrote:[

Of course dear... We just need not to be cheated by a lie on the box, on the website and on all revues....

You're posting on a forum now aren't you.
Anyone buying new technology has to do due diligence and research it online first.
No raw as yet has been a hot topic in every pocket camera forum debate, and has been mentioned in every review I've read.
If you didn't know there was currently no raw, you haven't done enough research. But I suspect it's just another over blown gripe by which to hammer BMD by people who seem to live to hammer BMD - just like the delivery date and the blooming sensor.

Watch my answer made to Mr Mac Jaeger.
False argument as far I am concerned.
Preorder ? you know what does that mean???
No reviews at that time mentionning NO RAW but the CONTRARY, all reviews were talking about the incredible RAW present in this tiny camera...
Do you want I send you Internet references from last April ???
But I can't prevent myself to copy and past here what I just found (I mean at this precise moment) on the BM website :

Shooting Resolutions
Lossless CinemaDNG RAW and Apple ProRes 422 (HQ) at 1920 x 1080

Now lets make a bit of philosophy, You spoke about the fact I didn't done enough research, Do you mean that I can't beleive the specs on the manufacturer website and go to deep in the Web reviews ?
Stange mental and intellectual behaviour...
Your answer proove you agree that BM is lying still today or - if you prefer - not saying the reality... Semantic question...

Posted: **Sun Oct 13, 2013 11:36 am**

Natal wrote:
Mac Jaeger wrote:Let's see it that way: it's only been two months since the first Pocket cams were shipped - even if it feels a lot longer, probably due to the long wait for the camera itself before. They said that raw would come later through a firmware update, and now they are close to delivering said update. Nothing to be angry about.

They might be planning to do it after shipping, but in that case the claim should not have been printed on the box. They could always modify the box after implementing it. The average person buying these cameras are probably not following these boards on a frequent basis - they would only come to the web site when there was a problem, and finding out that there isn't actually RAW would take digging on their part.

In any case, if a manufacturer prints a claim of a feature on the box, a buyer should have a reasonable expectation that the item in the box actually supports that feature. It is also reasonable for the buyer to get upset when they find out through trial and error that it doesn't. That is why most reputable companies don't do it.

IMO what happened is that the box is another example of a lapse of QC in BM's production. The boxes should never have been used to ship product out in. It almost seems as if they don't have a QC department, or if they do, they should get a new one.

+1 You right.

Posted: **Sun Oct 13, 2013 1:14 pm**

So you preordered a product that had not even been reviewed? That's ok, it's the proverbial "cat in a bag", and a little bit like playing the lottery. Still i don't understand why you complain about missing or misleading information after you willingly made an uninformed decision. And even more, why you didn't cancel your preorder once it was known that the camera would ship without raw.

Sorry. There are a couple of things BMD screwed up, but i don't count this one among them.

Posted: **Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:49 pm**

Mac Jaeger wrote:So you preordered a product that had not even been reviewed? That's ok, it's the proverbial "cat in a bag", and a little bit like playing the lottery. Still i don't understand why you complain about missing or misleading information after you willingly made an uninformed decision. And even more, why you didn't cancel your preorder once it was known that the camera would ship without raw.

Sorry. There are a couple of things BMD screwed up, but i don't count this one among them.

You seem to be a guy who wants always have the last word...
But apparently you are not able to read my message before answering repeatedly the same blah blah.
Anything else is mere verbiage and preaching.

By the way let us know "what couple of things BMD screwed up" according to you just to appreciate if we do count them among !

Blackmagic Forum

BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!

Re: BMPCC NO RAW - WHY?! WHERE?! WHEN?!