This says native ISO is BS...
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2021 9:53 pm
pocketluts.com/a-only-slightly-less-confusing-explanation-of-the-pocket-4ks-iso-settings
I always heard that I should shoot one of the native ISO's on my BMPCC 4K to have as much dynamic range but it seems by the chart in the bottom of the above link that the dynamic range is always the same and only the range changes.
So if I'm using 100 ISO I will have more details in the highlights and less in the shadows and vise versa right?
So, why shouldn't I just use the ISO I need in order to preserve the details where I need?
Also, if ISO doesn't matter when shooting raw then why would it even affect the dynamic range?
What about high ISO with an ND filter to go back to the same exposure I will get with the native ISO at 400?
Am confused...
I always heard that I should shoot one of the native ISO's on my BMPCC 4K to have as much dynamic range but it seems by the chart in the bottom of the above link that the dynamic range is always the same and only the range changes.
So if I'm using 100 ISO I will have more details in the highlights and less in the shadows and vise versa right?
So, why shouldn't I just use the ISO I need in order to preserve the details where I need?
Also, if ISO doesn't matter when shooting raw then why would it even affect the dynamic range?
What about high ISO with an ND filter to go back to the same exposure I will get with the native ISO at 400?
Am confused...